From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AA2C49361 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 01:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD1060BBB for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 01:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233385AbhFRBCs (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 21:02:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35004 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233042AbhFRBCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 21:02:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5D5C061574; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id p7so13473617lfg.4; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WIJQ3I2aHHqEFy6allhgHQlkD9N//YkR+UZzwYu38T8=; b=rrti8oDyrMEoM9XLaCuvXzr0MgHlOC17ZpO5+kA359xY2RzstvIYo//N78Dm7ZBEjB v2GcxrH/Zu0dzBBmz8IpGqdC7QLYMs0UoN7xIqcTj6sTXd9WBRrJC2QKzTWT2F86WVKb YTAlmai4NQOy1yZFGNDYynUGtZ1d4EA1dtnYDt7FpcdclkFfFK/g9o/nBZTESb8rpDMe 2Zbzlr1mdcAZWV+8XnnjcMD+IoVS0qf/BvnhratmzDAmOv1HV3pLRIT1I5TDcjk3IEOw KsdYE1kMpbaIY0mRBoEClodFe6gu9HLqwj/0+9UyqwOz75pxsqnmviBjc00jB4WEoSYY 2vBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WIJQ3I2aHHqEFy6allhgHQlkD9N//YkR+UZzwYu38T8=; b=B8PgMXehj6kfxOXPx7vo4zFGCzUHJwaOpYeFeq9FQtT45MuZ7VKCTGGm2nXlJp+xEQ ltHQZBn5qjcvU/CYzfWqtoOZBkEog4AGIvLQpX63MVHDz8yloePl9XH+bJpd1ujJTzZy vxkuWtDR8KXifs7hRaN8OyyE4AHuOfH7cyZQ1wxHewxgwneqB2WlpDxbmYVK78Z8mv4S nIoBPQrFzKNO58cGKdArgnb1AjAjwaswUM0u153wPTQmaFEEq7X+acWKEQD6WGiuBBOO VGimN82rZ418MSqmG5aSF/hSoKg786Sd9lckJtFJ41pGv4gohxp320ek5y4uT1gxnn1k 4Oqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53145Yh/HVreHJZ32Gavxv4rcKC0Mm7Awj1Xf25RVdfLuoSu7Wm7 Uuxkz8TjY/kcVSMycdGTxVzmk3ehxumMV5C9kSE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs8nkwun6tCij6fdduNRqIwTBFpsdMk/+o8cxsHnN0y+mF+gca4qia/fI3A8l6DztRQkF5Ky3D2Zq7J9Osb0g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d15:: with SMTP id d21mr910768lfv.252.1623978035887; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:00:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210527091618.287093-1-foxhlchen@gmail.com> <162396935764.29912.16256561662425331146@noble.neil.brown.name> In-Reply-To: <162396935764.29912.16256561662425331146@noble.neil.brown.name> From: Fox Chen Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:00:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] docs: path-lookup: Update pathlookup docs To: NeilBrown Cc: Jonathan Corbet , vegard.nossum@oracle.com, Al Viro , rdunlap@infradead.org, grandmaster@al2klimov.de, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:36 AM NeilBrown wrote: > > On Thu, 27 May 2021, Fox Chen wrote: > > The Path lookup is a very complex subject in VFS. The path-lookup > > document provides a very detailed guidance to help people understand > > how path lookup works in the kernel. This document was originally > > written based on three lwn articles five years ago. As times goes by, > > some of the content is outdated. This patchset is intended to update > > the document to make it more relevant to current codebase. > > > > Thanks for persisting. Sorry for the delay. Thanks for the review. :D > All: > Reviewed-by: NeilBrown > > I've noted a couple of little issues with one patch. Hopefully Jon can > simply fix those up rather than requiring a resubmission of the whole > series. if needed, I can resubmit just this single patch. > To be honest, I haven't examined patch 4 in as much detail as I'd like, > and it required the biggest change since last time. But I think it is > good enough. It might even be excellent. > > NeilBrown thanks, fox