From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDB2C35242 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420220709 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b="SYiA638T" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730056AbgAXJAQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:00:16 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com ([209.85.167.196]:44885 "EHLO mail-oi1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729205AbgAXJAP (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:00:15 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d62so1165018oia.11 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 01:00:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y5EdAX4jkVg2iEO+KKBvYFZ7L2IwmUhmxABZtxwTDV0=; b=SYiA638TtjKWHVPo9XbMk9DzdWhGr1CIMjfL5RmNwAC2FuJ6BOftRJALOXEDQiOQgD 0fjQoQpuqFcsjWawODT6waRgT8tHbtcT5JbVS8ovS/gCJVG1G3aXBRiiXbpoEpsTruoE k8771UvRA3plyOhzpLxUGm4QDuiJyGVU7AgoI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y5EdAX4jkVg2iEO+KKBvYFZ7L2IwmUhmxABZtxwTDV0=; b=mvd8msfm/DjiQxygeeGJQL2kvyORts9aZa/ZUOjTYcQT1SKENxoasSS+RugahmInLU +mQo0LZyPy0IrEI/iK6BQ65glMNqVaXyUXlvOUcCif6LITq77mw85PcFxnFuiR9Joq9A lWC/Q30Jcsp6ebssiLPgWIM6dRNby0BXydThaFQ7JYEU5ubovpIFLtKBjxJgfmtr9+0k y5VeN73oDvp2dDRv1q+bxeFzXV5qdeIatSGDzLN5zNhVWgA/YCaYKF08m4yAKOJbflkS yiyAw5Rr7WMGn/k2MEZU9eWXZQIw5l1G9/0DXnVP3SNRkeWMYRaHKrorOg00GAvMJkxF OVpA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbEkdOO2m5TwDI2KgaBBDQBuX8x+7TEl0MvwBesBmsFm1B6tT1 +qrZnmwQux6ZGCarLhcOOBYtNV7onJp6QuTVWXJNnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwCWyvS3/fUmsDI0shGPjRGN1rHYxo1MRumsxADvX5K0fx2R5oslkof/sexUronmyCand4NPkj0N/nR2Fj0XYs= X-Received: by 2002:aca:2419:: with SMTP id n25mr1382621oic.13.1579856414929; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 01:00:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200123165934.9584-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123165934.9584-3-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Lorenz Bauer Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:03 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests To: Martin Lau Cc: Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau wrote: > > btw, it needs a Fixes tag. > > Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag. This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have to split the series then? -- Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer 6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK www.cloudflare.com