From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395EEC4363D for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 20:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F86206B6 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 20:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ij7PUtkJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725790AbgJBU7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58690 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbgJBU7H (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:07 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34240C0613D0; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id o18so2501809ilg.0; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:59:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XkEYe1/fNy+Pf7SIAfod53fKG7vqHvWMD5Ql6n+ejRA=; b=Ij7PUtkJXXbHQuBf9b8ZOxPvaU1A4n3iWSWa3CFASIc7I4v8wyPm4Dupo2AuLqWE/w y7POCNEBvYyDVb9dqHo7ls4kSRElaq2Wyo+FXtnQR3JeOfOI7ZC2dDGllAnD0D7+03/Z jQv/4GTdmY9ehua0cjtW9uSpqctb/J7/XRt3Kg8GMt4uL+JeLuUTzYR14atNNX8Vdz+W 0XIPgJ/lI7OObl5sItq82k81rc10JdjlY/taAZL9qlqYLYNeWhoFhWYVRxgYJ3u8eGJ4 0CyEDwkz3fsXUDvujQTCe9e6yRSTHWkp66vpM+XILRSp/ZhBVUDOjIpNqJX4MYalH+gn qG4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XkEYe1/fNy+Pf7SIAfod53fKG7vqHvWMD5Ql6n+ejRA=; b=Yb3n1KV6Cq5kKpZptZ+G/umGtQ17CWT5D/GFpuQ3sjKltoO4PPl6zNZd82XdHSthba aErkV0LIt2MWbV2IHPG+mW3P2BsMO5j+pu3weKFjOfq6PsuDBqt930ldLU4NuCIfbS2T 35A6FhzBXYM9CpTRqTsBH6pnvlaY9GjLw9AmiK3X82Mg18962hflecMzsnQXU+61L40D m3+pgV/HZbe6uB8qPP/j96s5tHuPq/0onvTG3+bDJzfZSZd7GrvMTYaCm42bsklItMIP LnRJ7D/YaES2G/en+on6fxqR3h7J1aXxQgo1EAqsobQfb3ezK0h/oGeXnRHALDdePvWY 9q1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HsbEMPDUo6xHyhqFGtVEDd5TAuRC2YcCmd8rlyOWr7fGCl2st 6RqWFJoMQLC8Hfe4+s1BRcFyvUj5nYcrdW8ibag= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwldEJ93I2YYlI4aV0mGMs3+uEX9u8wY+YfRcK16cMXr4MrtvoeooObH0TWVAJOdlNaj0/+P/5Ow69DdAaFFg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:ba4d:: with SMTP id o74mr3331734ili.205.1601672346502; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:59:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200911225417.GA5286@shinobu> <20200929130743.GB4458@shinobu> In-Reply-To: From: Syed Nayyar Waris Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 02:28:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andy Shevchenko , William Breathitt Gray , Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko , Michal Simek , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Richter , Bartosz Golaszewski , Masahiro Yamada , Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Linux-Arch , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux ARM , Linux PM list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:59 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:14 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > Linus, are you referencing to [3]? It was fixed in GENMASK() > > implementation some time ago. > > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202006171559.JSbGJXNw%25lkp@intel.com/ > > Yup. > > I tried to apply the patches again now to test it but now patch 2 > needs to be rebased. > > Sorry for all the trouble! > > Syed can you rebase the patch set on v5.9-rc1 and resend as v10? Sure Linus. I will send it as soon as possible. Thanks Syed Nayyar Waris