From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10728C433F5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 02:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231801AbiCRCXW (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:23:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231714AbiCRCXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:23:20 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1BD14DFDE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:22:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647570121; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jcLirLBEGvDklvL5IK4efni0vW6AGIFKCzBkNt8jT7I=; b=S8a/WwwAv9Q5PLCPEG7pqvrm01Byb3a6oFhIO3xwWwwYzGe2tGaLLVlRg7ecJmtDB24PT2 qPHIK2r6BDpGlk91Pg7Q9rbYtunYE84xEdocEfEVaJl3WwEUR/KsvvDwmlzms01UMz7hZm Rn1fnbC9r/+mkF8HTP0ibtoGtTLaXxQ= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-313-ABaCNY-2O0yIENAsREIDEA-1; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ABaCNY-2O0yIENAsREIDEA-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 6-20020a2eb946000000b002463d2915d2so2840852ljs.9 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:22:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jcLirLBEGvDklvL5IK4efni0vW6AGIFKCzBkNt8jT7I=; b=mnv8+zr7ZWwEckcStbIVDMWuETWq2MNR6SO7HJqpamDP1GBnVMsBh4dySVQ37TfdbO lmf0EnVe5pvafG5MggV1wJVbWdMdsF/QHnWA73faUqEg71TgAHfYHjZP//9FFEf+pmZy NR8JfD3OYx2+FtWFKlhdfwqxps1vNxrZlYdijH/GLmf6JtsqxRomifg1ecaFfyXdxTpz RiNgizr4oDi3wNUY0xAUcwXJKskAIeIXCDMjV8PTeehW+TvSxGe88Hgz8y4Ht3dGkIF/ lIWdn5b/dR32r0wcysLqdTThSTX4uZnRcDwVRrWhVsW6+HA0SBYq3+CLtH8VCJSo25IE HTpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WMjDNAtCM4bmOcNmCKhBf44OcDGy+kAE/qfgPsluzLEgI1VQk 7snXoS/FieTN6mUhSwnc9oAbePL4dhDT+RWVo4X4+N/J0ENutO4cIRZkdE2MZ6NkqrrQ464NYxD L1838L+z83LFR0x86nUsy9yaqx0KYxVcp6rCzRk5r X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a54b:0:b0:249:5889:70bb with SMTP id e11-20020a2ea54b000000b00249588970bbmr3089132ljn.73.1647570118802; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxk6ZmWwZJZgL5aAwzVCKI91S5sYhdAYPx9fT50h9cafmylYRfNrDC7JqFe8GbC9ScB1+C+LvoG3W2kcLxxVP8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a54b:0:b0:249:5889:70bb with SMTP id e11-20020a2ea54b000000b00249588970bbmr3089119ljn.73.1647570118609; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:21:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220318005858.2141967-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <20220318005858.2141967-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> From: Jason Wang Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:21:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] virito-pci-modern: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration To: cgel.zte@gmail.com Cc: mst , virtualization , linux-kernel , Minghao Chi , Zeal Robot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:59 AM wrote: > > From: Minghao Chi > > As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if > dev->dma_mask is non-NULL. > So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason. > > Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly. > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398 > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > index e8b3ff2b9fbc..dff0b15a239d 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev) > } > > err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); > - if (err) > - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, > - DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); So we had: if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; in dma_set_mask(), any reason dma_supported() can't be false here? Thanks > if (err) > dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, "Failed to enable 64-bit or 32-bit DMA. Trying to continue, but this might not work.\n"); > > -- > 2.25.1 >