From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757133Ab3BKNCh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:02:37 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:54247 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757033Ab3BKNCf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:02:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5118E60E.5060606@synopsys.com> References: <1359024639-21915-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1359024639-21915-9-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <51189D2F.4030000@synopsys.com> <5118C458.2070205@synopsys.com> <5118C7B6.6040807@imgtec.com> <5118D478.3010205@synopsys.com> <5118E60E.5060606@synopsys.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:02:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pt_regs leak into userspace (was Re: [PATCH v3 20/71] ARC: Signal handling) From: Jonas Bonn To: Vineet Gupta Cc: James Hogan , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 February 2013 13:37, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > Anyhow going back to my orig patch - if we park the > callee-regs-in-sigcontext-or-not, other bits look OK ? > Aside from the callee-regs question (which I hope somebody more knowledgeable can chime in on): Acked-by: Jonas Bonn