From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E052FC433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF7464E42 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231630AbhBQHps (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:45:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46936 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230267AbhBQHpo (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:45:44 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBF5C061574; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 23:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id r77so11905708qka.12; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 23:45:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jms.id.au; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gCYHkP1aaPC2ju2paPaY+eoqpfjSVcunRt30wEH2p8U=; b=AAHObVQGaERydM1DlwWubQJKTKTVnmQBfgoX0PGJn29iia5qcb/iGf1AoROZuZSqvl w+PMF3vUx06pWgQNfzENim4S9nkdJxlUW7hEpi6jIvu1/aO87i9jsX5dtWqRrJos722i NmAofX+BGRlEjlnFc/i1f4WoZSH26+35dlwUA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gCYHkP1aaPC2ju2paPaY+eoqpfjSVcunRt30wEH2p8U=; b=B37HOIWPh9rX7M1MYITUSoECSwr0PXqnSOobchWKZjT7YZv23QmXFe/06YVCz6JUFx yXNe9Lfi0C691liTZlg+lhVTxNTdz44zNEV6h7+d4MDp15kbnyRrPiCDB+kV4XvUccde KBeR/GZ//KZMXd+b08zOWnofw+EKsvCN8xgrWmluR2FBAmiBo0f4+BsaEw3lSwivM2rI Zh0bDTddQ3ila/U9ohC0+H0+H7paqYqL1mG/QBFjoHSpUtphF/9o3TRMTk9yRODBJAEm BCmofcMb8b8f+TWzKi39alT3LtJCVO4Rc5zB4KLsLvLhg/AWNW//vv5KQpXNynrj/kH+ QObw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ve25XoGqAaIwtBkQvsMr5XRVE9FapwtreZGD6x/GefOnA6Yf9 62EI6RNDBI/ihkcV66TREBFSBbNYHR0sb2stxrg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZtu3Qq+3imBOs8bwV65/o2jyioHqrf93AnZbhcE4AEEgRRwSgKEqek1P9uLpKbbu/kI/mf9O2uP6SF4p1+PI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:27d2:: with SMTP id n201mr19429138qkn.465.1613547903021; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 23:45:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210114131622.8951-1-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com> <20210114131622.8951-2-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com> <85f00459-4a39-441e-8119-8e12f8132cfe@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Joel Stanley Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:44:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: aspeed-lpc: Remove LPC partitioning To: ChiaWei Wang Cc: Andrew Jeffery , Lee Jones , BMC-SW , Haiyue Wang , Robert Lippert , Rob Herring , Linus Walleij , Corey Minyard , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chaiwei, On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 07:40, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > > Hi All, > > Do you have update on this patch series? > Aspeed has subsequent LPC module upstream plan. > We hope that the following patches can be on the basis of the fixed LPC layout. Andrew has expressed his support for your changes. I will take time to closely review your proposal this week. We will set the goal of having this rework merged for the next merge window. Cheers, Joel > Thanks. > > Chiawei > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Jeffery > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:25 AM > > To: Lee Jones > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: aspeed-lpc: Remove LPC partitioning > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, at 23:46, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote: > > > The LPC controller has no concept of the BMC and the Host partitions. > > > This patch fixes the documentation by removing the description on LPC > > > partitions. The register offsets illustrated in the DTS node examples > > > are also fixed to adapt to the LPC DTS change. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang > > > > Any thoughts Lee? If you ack it would you be happy for the patch to go through > > the Aspeed tree? > > > > Andrew