From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757468Ab2IJLeS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:34:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:42710 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757344Ab2IJLeQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:34:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1347016499-29354-12-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1347016499-29354-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1347016499-29354-12-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:34:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: ux500: Add all known I2C sub-device nodes to the HREF DT From: Linus Walleij To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > Here we add the skeleton nodes for each of the known I2C sub-devices > currently registered on ST-Ericsson's HREF Development Platform. We > will fill these nodes in turn as the drivers are enabled for Device > Tree. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Can't we have it the other way around (discussing patch ordering with Arnd simultaneously), so you first add the DT support to the subdevices, then add the more complete nodes to the device tree? And if you put in a device tree like this, will these devices not collide with the ones that are currently supplied from the boardfiles? I'm a bit confused here, maybe I'm not smart enough to understand this... Yours, Linus Walleij