From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754682AbdKCHuf (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:50:35 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:54729 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752474AbdKCHud (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:50:33 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Qju3Ab0JOFd0R06GSveMN9EZ+YOwIzrXR5K5N9ok9R1bgWQs4U33zcntfSXNcbpp9Sluu08XieWjSrHOzjgJU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171102162038.339466ef@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20171102162038.339466ef@canb.auug.org.au> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Masahiro Yamada Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > .activate = uniphier_gpio_irq_domain_activate, > ^ > > Caused by commit > > dbe776c2ca54 ("gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver") > > interacting with commit > > 72491643469a ("genirq/irqdomain: Update irq_domain_ops.activate() signature") > > from the tip tree > > I added the following merge fix patch: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:10:46 +1100 > Subject: [PATCH] gpio: uniphier: merge fix for "Update > irq_domain_ops.activate() signature" > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing to do at this point. I suspect the IRQ infrastructure will be pulled to Torvald's tree first anyway. Yours, Linus Walleij