From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936099AbcJTMw5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:52:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:36646 "EHLO mail-qk0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934102AbcJTMw4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:52:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161019121614.3crr76qyexhamjiy@lukather> References: <20161019121614.3crr76qyexhamjiy@lukather> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:52:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> > @@ -342,6 +365,8 @@ static void sunxi_pctrl_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> > struct pinctrl_map *map, >> > unsigned num_maps) >> > { >> > + unsigned long *pinconfig; >> >> This looks out of place and context? > > Yeah, sorry, it's just a leftover from the previous version. This has > been removed. Do you mean you will send a v3 of this series? OK stopping to apply then. But I have already applied patches 1, 2 and 3 so just resend the rest :) Yours, Linus Walleij