From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756114Ab2INOAx (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:00:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:59219 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755298Ab2INOAv (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:00:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120914092332.GL3374@gmail.com> References: <1347016499-29354-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1347016499-29354-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120914092332.GL3374@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:00:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] ARM: ux500: Add nodes for the MSP into the HREF Device Tree From: Linus Walleij To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:53:45AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> > + msp3: msp@80125000 { >> > + status = "okay"; >> > + }; >> > }; >> > }; >> >> Does this really "enable" the MSPs as the title claims? > > Yes they do. > >> Aren's there any kind of bindings needed, not even a >> register base? > > All that information is in the "disabled" node contained in .dtsi file. Argh it's hard to read DT patches without parsing through all the .dtsi:s in your head first ... Acked-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij