From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4229C10DAA for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E45208FE for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="K2ir22V8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725854AbgILL2u (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:28:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725820AbgILL16 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:27:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com (mail-lj1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04158C061573 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id k25so14592032ljg.9 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XMgjoPvhBymfHHvxoDHXTWG3WNCgF0x+QyIygNl61qo=; b=K2ir22V83VWYej3YXRtevdddjiVrwkyl9QVqmYMZG3B7/24spsZWiQX+krop1tfWAB KB58AfX+WRynhoSlRl51gU8WCfEolkXA1set4DxteuYMb5BDl6uhbE6WkgCZtTjOrYMH gNH/SykGqxdt2Zt1DR0Axxpf7uyfmhHnHlB7aS0nGBSZpaMOMSFsm1ukk2jnQWul6pv/ HARODYj7k1Jw9VcX63i/zQDmEEIyWjyZX6UnlNB8z/46S9IrO2TpLRWMGKIQoXuBWElD azi9iVA2mvJV8N5bx2mtIrNhkcgXgScgOLAThgzgvg+NKpfoJibr3DiTfkIcylg+nkCy UPhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XMgjoPvhBymfHHvxoDHXTWG3WNCgF0x+QyIygNl61qo=; b=j4dN5WWOXTiY1+vIEocDWVjnWbDZSK73PKdehePMiOhtNl1zRZGpcjydEE5215heOG qXm/01bRlUtNegPk5+JwSFll2Av9+ZjFylcJM5K8N916eh7gjpI9V06tBMnfOKb1vK46 +P2MXbxc3aJivjXyBa5zGO/Kw5D+je8HHblsc0eykIOdjCGVhmAu7S0AzSSF08fCUaT1 LNMEDu2E2WDjpmebjJhMkUE+BQ5jcF+lhIO/FHgKEcLIFdlapAnRgWnEtCcn/2zy84Gi 8nR6XzprRQizyVlPORMY7EmNhl9SobBm/w4YucFzF7RbQZ7dMYqfI9xsfgupD1t7i//l NMtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mnQ7HbeLgQc9sCKrY7v6ahA6ZGnfe+lkRZlhTXlVfzdSpiO5V 7yrWEYoR013U4YpVne0DR2FWGwE6Bn5hBpZsH9fiNA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQe9XEaD08U6BUOCKzC2OeLI06PoyDUFw0hqEreXKuQOwFBcqG+MtAuhhsofCax+HVS//1g9iR5Ma1hBfvdUk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4e09:: with SMTP id c9mr2344401ljb.283.1599910074793; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200117081358.5772-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> In-Reply-To: <20200117081358.5772-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:27:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: rockchip: codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip To: Jianqun Xu Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , David Wu , Kever Yang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jianqun, Heiko, On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:14 AM Jianqun Xu wrote: > Do codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip by spliting driver by SoC types. > > Convenienty for reviewing, the first patch only moving > pinctrl-rockchip.c from driver/pinctrl to driver/pinctrl/rockchip/ . > > Jianqun Xu (2): > pinctrl: rockchip: new rockchip dir for pinctrl-rockchip > pinctrl: rockchip: split rockchip pinctrl driver by SoC type Why were these patches never applied? Is it my fault? I don't even have patch 2/2 in my mailbox, possibly it was too big! Heiko if you're OK with this change can Jianqun just send a rebased version? Yours, Linus Walleij