From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3994BC43331 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1210F207FC for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Ci1YJZmd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727625AbfKMNwi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:52:38 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:34004 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727614AbfKMNwh (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:52:37 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 139so2680754ljf.1 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 05:52:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KyCaCCfWBOINbn7kh6i3qJOp8XPmOM9fa7QHBkh+4VE=; b=Ci1YJZmdB2Q2xO8P8ZdU5WgniMH8a5hnf6ZkAVx0eSPqbbK8FstfQDpuqQ0TJKycDs okSgKVUg3ewqFjrcMTQuSYl76f6x/dN8tN3p+yaahJUVQJJVbWXpJfyAROrp4gUHpzFw +CTTjEoPH03lrRSQ0AGkkREZcJRujo3J/rAVvbxSthO86QPxgD4Xb6MpHpfIpgvZ3sI7 QZiKWqyV1ywUW03vvgfqW9jbrkq+KPVKB5A0fIV0sscO1/2DmCOeu+s8i+0QvkwQCeZb A5/zJpnugkJApnSwXPfRdoafoFYl80x17d+cI84FcN0CSeipZVo6saESTHnAlml8/Yl9 MESQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KyCaCCfWBOINbn7kh6i3qJOp8XPmOM9fa7QHBkh+4VE=; b=glQCAvihg3qvol/hBYG96grdH5krZdYKBdLALpJzf6V+NKIwk0DY3ofLjMoSuzqP6A 1cOMaepfr6t+YiJEmvbxntUnnEUHIvmoe34XhCJ6yZryDk/IwqZZHXg+igCPN3XVqrrc gonfHwufUKzyBqUgoJOB/+dn7Ytf3qfyAEH4cA/3IiIO7MyP1shxy3sTZlJYsdHZjS40 iCSTq9vaVezQLc8GUWTUsfk+BantyDQnggx4OwY60I7J7HQ2ZCPiWC0jllGn2+Pi+Hcl Tdl+ChUHRBmBDxea4BlgkZsrKCzeB7BBwMMp1ss5eakU+McwHUfQArbfCWfXFDy3579V gS/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXxVCqmNgn3vfeXA62Ta3ATyt3sFEL0abwgGULYbECaM93zkjTg V+Fl6HrcsCHm/d/QMFnVRFuSFjjue8Lv/f+NxzNnuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwW5jWVJFHvPatvx+5Uafl6Y4kdh7Hv2nQ1whBv+PrGGl3XmyfhiAZkbrBJslMf1I6D0AFeGfskbMrj03akYJU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8597:: with SMTP id b23mr2798713lji.218.1573653154150; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 05:52:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191014184320.GA161094@dtor-ws> <20191105004050.GU57214@dtor-ws> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index() To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Heikki Krogerus , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:41 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:29 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > I'm happy to merge it into the GPIO tree if some DRM maintainer can > > provide an ACK. > > Ack. Thanks! > > Getting ACK from DRM people is problematic and a bit of friction in the > > community, DVetter usually advice to seek mutual reviews etc, but IMO > > it would be better if some people felt more compelled to review stuff > > eventually. (And that has the problem that it doesn't scale.) > > This has a review already plus if you merge your implied review. Yeah I missed Laurent's review tag. I needed some kund of consent to take it into the GPIO tree I suppose. > That's more than good enough imo, so not seeing the issue here? No issue. What freaked me out was the option of having to pull in an immutable branch from my GPIO tree into drm-misc. That would have been scary. Keeping it all in my tree works fine. Yours, Linus Walleij