linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic-arb: Set lockdep class for hierarchical irq domains
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:16:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY_bB2Y5Y-ShW2YRAsRb4TQ2vQPagwtjEsMMqeCO1-sNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200121183748.68662-1-swboyd@chromium.org>

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:37 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:

> I see the following lockdep splat in the qcom pinctrl driver when
> attempting to suspend the device.
>
>  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
>  5.4.11 #3 Tainted: G        W
>  --------------------------------------------
>  cat/3074 is trying to acquire lock:
>  ffffff81f49804c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
>
>  but task is already holding lock:
>  ffffff81f1cc10c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
>
>  other info that might help us debug this:
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>         CPU0
>         ----
>    lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
>    lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
>
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
>
>   May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
>  6 locks held by cat/3074:
>   #0: ffffff81f01d9420 (sb_writers#7){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0xd0/0x1a4
>   #1: ffffff81bd7d2080 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x12c/0x1fc
>   #2: ffffff81f4c322f0 (kn->count#337){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x134/0x1fc
>   #3: ffffffe411a41d60 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}, at: pm_suspend+0x108/0x348
>   #4: ffffff81f1c5e970 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_suspend+0x168/0x41c
>   #5: ffffff81f1cc10c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
>
>  stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 5 PID: 3074 Comm: cat Tainted: G        W         5.4.11 #3
>  Hardware name: Google Cheza (rev3+) (DT)
>  Call trace:
>   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x174
>   show_stack+0x20/0x2c
>   dump_stack+0xc8/0x124
>   __lock_acquire+0x460/0x2388
>   lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210
>   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x64/0x80
>   __irq_get_desc_lock+0x64/0x94
>   irq_set_irq_wake+0x40/0x144
>   qpnpint_irq_set_wake+0x28/0x34
>   set_irq_wake_real+0x40/0x5c
>   irq_set_irq_wake+0x70/0x144
>   pm8941_pwrkey_suspend+0x34/0x44
>   platform_pm_suspend+0x34/0x60
>   dpm_run_callback+0x64/0xcc
>   __device_suspend+0x310/0x41c
>   dpm_suspend+0xf8/0x298
>   dpm_suspend_start+0x84/0xb4
>   suspend_devices_and_enter+0xbc/0x620
>   pm_suspend+0x210/0x348
>   state_store+0xb0/0x108
>   kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24
>   sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x64
>   kernfs_fop_write+0x15c/0x1fc
>   __vfs_write+0x54/0x18c
>   vfs_write+0xe4/0x1a4
>   ksys_write+0x7c/0xe4
>   __arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x2c
>   el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x160
>   el0_svc_handler+0x7c/0x98
>   el0_svc+0x8/0xc
>
> Set a lockdep class when we map the irq so that irq_set_wake() doesn't
> warn about a lockdep bug that doesn't exist.
>
> Fixes: 12a9eeaebba3 ("spmi: pmic-arb: convert to v2 irq interfaces to support hierarchical IRQ chips")
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>

Applied for fixes in the GPIO tree!

Thanks
Linus Walleij

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 18:37 [PATCH] spmi: pmic-arb: Set lockdep class for hierarchical irq domains Stephen Boyd
2020-01-23 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]   ` <5e29f186.1c69fb81.61d8.83b9@mx.google.com>
2020-02-03 19:02     ` Doug Anderson
2020-02-10 12:18       ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-10 12:16 ` Linus Walleij [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdY_bB2Y5Y-ShW2YRAsRb4TQ2vQPagwtjEsMMqeCO1-sNw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).