From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932146AbbGPLWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:22:07 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:33500 "EHLO mail-oi0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753331AbbGPLWF (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:22:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1435253451-19817-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> References: <1435253451-19817-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <1435253451-19817-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:22:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: assign chip owner to dev->driver->owner if not set From: Linus Walleij To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Sekhar Nori , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Johan Hovold Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Assign GPIO chip owner field to chip->dev->driver->owner if it was not > configured by GPIO driver. > > Cc: Johan Hovold > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko Patch applied with Alex' review tag. > There is also one positive additional side effect: > lines like below can be removed from a lot of GPIO > drivers > rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE; Yes let's do this :) Yours, Linus Walleij