From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753406Ab1H2JR2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 05:17:28 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:55766 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752372Ab1H2JRW (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 05:17:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110829110435.e7f2a6ae1637a6b13f2c5874@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20110829110435.e7f2a6ae1637a6b13f2c5874@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:17:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree From: Linus Walleij To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer , Russell King Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot between commit 74b84ad6c1a5 ("ARM: > 7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and > commit 732851465445 ("mach-u300: retire odd singlemem variant") from the > arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Looks correct, and it's one of the unavoidable things as we clean up the ARM tree, thanks a lot Stephen! Yours, Linus Walleij