linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: motorola-cpcap: Do not hardcode SPI mode flags
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:57:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYm2b7G6dvmY5VCSSQCK6DMEYMYRqnoMpH6jaumkQL3Xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191219170409.GH35479@atomide.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:04 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [700101 00:00]:
> > The current use of mode flags to us SPI_MODE_0 and
> > SPI_CS_HIGH is fragile: it overwrites anything already
> > assigned by the SPI core. Change it thusly:
> >
> > - Just |= the SPI_MODE_0 so we keep other flags
> > - Assign ^= SPI_CS_HIGH since we might be active high
> >   already, and that is usually the case with GPIOs used
> >   for chip select, even if they are in practice active low.
> >
> > Add a comment clarifying why ^= SPI_CS_HIGH is the right
> > choice here.
>
> Looks like this breaks booting for droid4 with a cpcap
> PMIC, probably as regulators won't work. There's no GPIO
> controller involved in this case for the chip select, the
> pins are directly controlled by the spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> driver.
>
> From the pin muxing setup we see there's a pull-down on
> mcspi1_cs0 pin meaning it's active high:
>
> /* 0x4a100138 mcspi1_cs0.mcspi1_cs0 ae23 */
> OMAP4_IOPAD(0x138, PIN_INPUT_PULLDOWN | MUX_MODE0)
>
> My guess a similar issue is with similar patches for
> all non-gpio spi controllers?
>
> Let me know if you want me to test some other changes,
> or if this patch depends on some other changes.

So this must mean that something else is setting SPI_CS_HIGH
for this driver, such as the device tree, right?

And the |= SPI_CS_HIGH assignment in the driver is just
surplus and we should just delete this code instead.

Would that be right?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04 23:19 [PATCH] mfd: motorola-cpcap: Do not hardcode SPI mode flags Linus Walleij
2019-12-19 17:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-01-07  9:57   ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-01-07 18:24     ` Tony Lindgren
2020-01-07 18:37       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdYm2b7G6dvmY5VCSSQCK6DMEYMYRqnoMpH6jaumkQL3Xg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).