Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control over SPI

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control over SPI
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:59:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYpy0x0Eek2ir3Dc8-DF7LteESKuo9etWZzdUdDdbxLnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119021437.GA1155@DESKTOP-LAINLKC.localdomain>

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:14 AM Colin Foster
<colin.foster@in-advantage.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:58:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: combine get resource and ioremap into single call
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: expose ocelot_pinctrl_core_probe interface
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: update to support regmap
> > >   device property: add helper function fwnode_get_child_node_count
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: change device tree matches to use nodes
> > >     instead of device
> > >   pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: expose microchip_sgpio_core_probe interface
> >
> > Can these patches be broken out to its own series and handled
> > separately from the DSA stuff or is there build-time dependencies?
>
> These should all be able to be a separate series if I did my job right.
> Everything should have no functional change except for this:
>
> > >   pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address
>
> Fortunately this was tested by Clément and didn't seem to have any
> ill-fated side effects.
>
> I assume this isn't something I wouldn't want to submit to net-next...
> is there a different place (tree? board? list?) where those should be
> submitted?

To the pinctrl maintainer i.e. me + linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
then I can just apply them if there are no more review comments.

Yours,
Linus Walleij