From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861BAC432BE for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B62960FC0 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232401AbhHKOaD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:30:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58476 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232224AbhHKOaC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:30:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA46BC061765 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id h2so4932427lji.6 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:29:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=byRWu4PhUCdZFFH1ZumTdX1T6Ymne+7G/GMqF1AsKeo=; b=TQ0+K8Q208fCgyW6b+ydqb4ei0swe653pxt/8T4zbPvt81Ga4ieUhFvLjVoMmO3PeG stZUDSJ9OwFw3PViTYGAtIIa3bQ7aMSN8GzbJr5s8GGl4y82H95drSpKNn8bL0+YzSNS 3L8WI8PbfzJVxsEWLlhwIx9KtZhs1hzZGHO02Q3LWWVXiqqAROaas3FaU67Pb4Q+NO6r t/5mGIjByjqIf2rxGMuYnGQ2fXq13F2V3J8iXwSwuPRQ5CZNFBYUXiNvcBP6pBY4O7vw Z6Ya2E81bbkVRnDFD+gfrsfGDqVT/Wlmi7Dc/iFQQZ46MXP+VFlJqhyUDYYF5LymDeUG 9iOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=byRWu4PhUCdZFFH1ZumTdX1T6Ymne+7G/GMqF1AsKeo=; b=gg0fiGAG2nBOOK4igo0hNwj6QtaX6AdHQTbJqrLQFjyfdd+o4VHhDsak6nzqgO5gKB nDddfmbk+X1x08IXZXVOcnx+gt7StjxLlHq4blFT6+CUJ+W4HPyrLbculPSxFu3RrUeL M2TiRzuMGkK+UFRocFa/w+TFr21gyuMrZ9uUJL4/bv3Azx9+76pEc5QbvlAcX9V53Jk4 q35tY3vOVkVHnUrk94X6BuBAvelYFxoFqr9jw7umVySte+FgYw4IFIDd4MDylyMHhzEY US3ya4bYe9zsqy/rmCWS0R7OIlJpl++s3qL/U+lkmZOt4uy2nm8j2Mx1VfLfzNTQmtsz 6i1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZAejabkUAXxS5KI3jlaFzd1Ad7gzPRqiATguRU9LYjNrdFK+Z 9BI0c2oiif2qgI7AyF6DNlbfimLz+mQuT07fkPImiw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBdYcghpunD657bOZ7806ZT+wcnJ7txkGAZ2F/bbA56xhlBP0tdZ7GGVTtpq3wji6h+fPbaw8uQmVTjYxu5ic= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a231:: with SMTP id i17mr13033001ljm.467.1628692177306; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:29:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210728041253.15382-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpiolib: convert 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names' to support multiple gpiochip banks per device To: Sergio Paracuellos Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio , Gregory Fong , Florian Fainelli , Matthias Brugger , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_van_Dorst?= , Andy Shevchenko , John Thomson , NeilBrown , Nicholas Mc Guire , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:27 PM Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > I was searching for clear patterns that were using a similar approach > to this new stuff inside the gpio folder and I was not able to > properly be sure which other drivers can get the same change that I > did for mt7621 and broadcom applied... If you point me out to which > drivers can also use this, I am ok in sending patches for all of them > when I come back from a little rest time on August 23th. I don't know exactly how to identify these but this is one: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c Yours, Linus Walleij