From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753849AbdA3R2b (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:28:31 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:38322 "EHLO mail-it0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752446AbdA3R2S (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:28:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170130152855.7e8cb6c2@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20170130152855.7e8cb6c2@canb.auug.org.au> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:28:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the staging tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Greg KH , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Roman Sommer , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. OK I'll mention it to Linus (the big penguin). Thanks! Linus Walleij