From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751256AbcFRIDm (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2016 04:03:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:34438 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751058AbcFRIDj (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2016 04:03:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1465978686-28578-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <1465978686-28578-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1465978686-28578-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:03:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: uniphier: fix meaningless drive control offsets To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > These are input-only pins. They do not support drive controlling > in the first place. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij