From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1942DC49ED9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E2120663 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="HURvKWzz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730967AbfILJvA (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:51:00 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:46669 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730680AbfILJu7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:50:59 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id e17so22933634ljf.13 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:50:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AdRYvJPvrvcMWGM+o4yy0OFD2vjnmvyON9CrpokCAF4=; b=HURvKWzzNwOqIen9JLlFUszay1jwdNZrVw+OUaJH02nSfnCz7CvVqGly7LHz9KIuZ7 bKsfyElQz42Rb9UJ+K9Eln4wIYBxpxF6UB8Oyvfcuk4UOylGJp8BgzBCztTU5XGTjIXA /EazIGzMT/Ufyzj/GQwAnE8XYzlDVQsi7M7e/LFyegdzNzZpe2cExDQwbzE/Ut0Pazoi N9xccxUwAy/4SLZMOsbGpm9v1vLWTQdDkVNT0FWxy5TNEtyeu29v9s3s27fYgKJEoleo lvtUF12sc5KZlHTwTcO2NVnE+6d6mlppSg83klp1qrOk6NwfyRu3qf3dsLG9dyPTV1tB qe7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AdRYvJPvrvcMWGM+o4yy0OFD2vjnmvyON9CrpokCAF4=; b=HP5ERcJwLgZ7CaUbUbV71La/7iLPThWK13hNL6M7ViRrbAQDqOHEDgaqBiLwNwv1sZ MmqxYXKg59PpqedYJTFzPKakJLSLNTWeWpPdNI2jgKVqYCJfupg3D09ySX2htBEhH3vl SwPVHVLpdGJuuHzuecS3u40DOVceBJgkodVL+FEQp4QgUAP24LAjo6UwYC9LDl0Wh4Mn KKtCt96xx8XcTcrkdC5r5j9hClFOu5Ha/OuXQCHRPXrlQuw5tVSHEE9gdpfVTEI90tmc O15pRDTUmSleL02AveCK/A5fPl/TyINOwd+X5PYcGopaQESNGrs5hdrsZ7WXEENjGLJa UR9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWi4oTzdhwLq3ZF4ZTgLPaIOYyr8IONps+h82HpXSHnkTe9OTx/ PtgLmZX0KmOxWKkhqr7kd28W2NvzY+Lv30U29N/Zvw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzwrb438IO36oEfPSf+7fcsnQVQMy0lMdYLWC5HSg6an/q4RM9Kwj8Y1/EdXgPTXqwidtFWBMIcHQToquQEKo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a408:: with SMTP id p8mr25758282ljn.54.1568281857654; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:50:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20190911075215.78047-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190911075215.78047-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] gpiolib: introduce fwnode_gpiod_get_index() To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > This introduces fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that iterates through common gpio > suffixes when trying to locate a GPIO within a given firmware node. > > We also switch devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() to call > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() instead of iterating through GPIO suffixes on > its own. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov So I'd like to merge this as well for v5.4 because I see where you're going with this and it's nice to have these APIs in place for that. Please rebase this and the other one and resend! Yours, Linus Walleij