From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754605Ab2HNI3W (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:29:22 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:48434 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754210Ab2HNI3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 04:29:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1344527635-6163-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1344527635-6163-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1344527635-6163-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:29:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Provide the PRCMU with its own IRQ domain From: Linus Walleij To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Samuel Ortiz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > +static struct irq_domain *db8500_irq_domain; So this is a good idea. > +int db8500_irq_get_virq(int irq); And I'm sceptic about this business. Why isn't this physical-to virtual mapping business confined to the core MFD driver? But enlighten me. Yours, Linus Walleij