From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752620Ab2AQJBq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:01:46 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:60918 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340Ab2AQJBp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:01:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F153221.3080509@freemail.hu> References: <4F12AB38.5040009@freemail.hu> <4F153221.3080509@freemail.hu> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:01:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio-pch: cleanup __iomem annotation usage From: Linus Walleij To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9meth_M=E1rton?= Cc: Grant Likely , Linus Walleij , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2012/1/17 Németh Márton : > Hi Linux, :-) Common mistake, as are our brother Kubys who also appear on the lists sometimes... > You are right, the correct one should be "void __iomem *im_reg;" . > > Should I resend a patch for this? Yep just send it with subject [PATCH 1/2 v2] atleast that's what I usually do. Yours, Linus Walleij