From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751465AbbALAFP (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:05:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:58582 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbbALAFN (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:05:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4938579.0KIk3QtTCP@wuerfel> References: <1420857290-8373-1-git-send-email-robh@kernel.org> <1420857290-8373-8-git-send-email-robh@kernel.org> <4938579.0KIk3QtTCP@wuerfel> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:05:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] ARM: integrator: convert PCI to use generic config accesses From: Linus Walleij To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rob Herring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pci , Bjorn Helgaas , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2015 22:40:22 Linus Walleij wrote: >> > static int v3_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, >> > int size, u32 *val) >> > { >> > - addr = v3_open_config_window(bus, devfn, where); >> > + int ret = pci_generic_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, val); >> > v3_close_config_window(); >> > + return ret; >> > } >> > >> > static int v3_write_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, >> > int size, u32 val) >> > { >> > + int ret = pci_generic_config_write(bus, devfn, where, size, val); >> > v3_close_config_window(); >> > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&v3_lock, flags); >> > + return ret; >> > } >> > >> > static struct pci_ops pci_v3_ops = { >> > + .map_bus = v3_open_config_window, >> > .read = v3_read_config, >> > .write = v3_write_config, >> >> So .map_bus is called before every .read/.write operation I take it. >> >> Wouldn't it be proper to call the v3_close_config_window() from a >> matching .unmap_bus() callback for symmetry? > > It would be nicer for integrator but useless for anything else, so > I'd vote for leaving it the way Rob posted. OK I buy that, throw in a comment about it in the code if there is some time for iterating the patch. Yours, Linus Walleij