From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754232Ab2KVShG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:37:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:55312 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990Ab2KVShC (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:37:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1353407384-26880-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1353435212-15325-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:43:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C From: Linus Walleij To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Grant Likely Cc: w.sang@pengutronix.de, Mika Westerberg , rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > would like the patches to be modified somehow? > > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK. For GPIO I want Grant to ACK this. He has experience with both Device Tree and GPIO, knows what ACPI and UEFI is and is way better suited than me to give feedback on this kind of stuff. So from my stance it's "neutral, whatever Grant says goes". Yours, Linus Walleij