From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mtd-xip: work around clang/llvm bug
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:48:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZbEL7njJEO+0UYzzkck+UeMuADgB4Nwvet5B2ZALDcZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709091747.cg3cqmzdfpzks2vx@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 11:17 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:41:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > I guess this brings up the old question whether the compiler should
> > be worked around or just considered immature, but as it happens this
> > other day I was grep:ing around to find "the 8 NOP" that is so
> > compulsively inserted in ARM executables (like at the very start of
> > the kernel execution)
>
> The NOPs at the start of the kernel executable have nothing what so ever
> to do with this. They are there to align the kernel entry with the old
> a.out format that was used (which had a 32 byte header). Consequently,
> there are boot loaders around that jump to 32 bytes into the kernel
> header.
Wow! Finally the puzzle pieces come together. And it makes a lot
of sense.
> There are other places that we insert 10 NOPs (at cpu_relax()) due to a
> CPU errata (otherwise a tight loop basically stalls other CPUs.)
Pretty interesting too!
I try to learn a bit more intrinsics of the Arm architecture (been doing
assembly experiments recent days) so getting to know things like
this is very valuable.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-09 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 20:30 [PATCH] ARM: mtd-xip: work around clang/llvm bug Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-08 20:54 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-09 8:41 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-09 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-07-09 11:48 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2019-07-09 18:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-09 18:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-09 22:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-07-10 8:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-10 8:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-07-09 12:17 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-09 12:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-07-09 18:11 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZbEL7njJEO+0UYzzkck+UeMuADgB4Nwvet5B2ZALDcZQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).