From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1757234AbcHWJ1O (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 23 Aug 2016 05:27:14 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:36097 "EHLO
        mail-oi0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753210AbcHWJ1L (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 23 Aug 2016 05:27:11 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160823064755.GA2598@lukather>
References: <20160823055826.20591-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> <20160823064755.GA2598@lukather>
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:27:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaHY=TFE3H=CM2fu3etHcWq569MDOE2cJY=PGZauHwO2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: fix uart1 CTS/RTS pins at PG on A23/A33
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> PG8, PG9 is said to be the CTS/RTS pins for UART1 according to the A23/33
>> datasheets. However, the function is wrongly named "uart2" in the pinctrl
>> driver. This patch fixes this by modifying them to be named "uart1".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
>
> This looks good, but could you send it to stable?

If that is an ACK I can tag it for stable when applying.

Yours,
Linus Walleij