From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751180AbcIGWNj (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:13:39 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:35391 "EHLO mail-oi0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754AbcIGWN3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:13:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1473170343-16853-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <1473170343-16853-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 00:13:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio/gpiolib: Forbid irqchip default trigger if probed over DT To: Marc Zyngier , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Using a default trigger is a bad idea if using DT to configure > interrupts, as the device's interrupt specifier will always contain > the trigger configuration. > > Let's warn about that particular situation, and revert to not > having a default. Hopefully, the couple of drivers still using > this feature will quickly be fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Patch applied. This is a good way to get rid of this madness. > + /* > + * Specifying a default trigger is a terrible idea if DT is > + * used to configure the interrupts, as you may end-up with > + * conflicting triggers. Tell the user, and reset to NONE. > + */ > + if (WARN_ON(of_node && type != IRQ_TYPE_NONE, > + "%s: Ignoring %d default trigger\n", of_node->full_name)) > + type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; I *strongly* suspect this is bad also when using ACPI. Would the GPIO ACPI people devise a patch on top of this to emit the same warning for the ACPI usecase? Yours, Linus Walleij