From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753137AbcD2JW2 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:22:28 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:33602 "EHLO
	mail-oi0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752348AbcD2JWW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:22:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1461835923-68492-2-git-send-email-qiujiang@huawei.com>
References: <1461835923-68492-1-git-send-email-qiujiang@huawei.com>
	<1461835923-68492-2-git-send-email-qiujiang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:22:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaS3+6ZJS0MJk-j4J3j2mKC-MULgCbS8Dqy=4_toy-x9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] gpio: dwapb: remove name from dwapb_port_property
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>,
        Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>, charles.chenxin@huawei.com,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote:

> This patch removed the name property from dwapb_port_property.
> The name property is redundant, since we can get this info
> from dwapb_gpio dev node.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>

Hmmm just applied another version. Oh well, applying this
instead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij