From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967682AbdAKPpc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:45:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:33806 "EHLO mail-qk0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934276AbdAKPp2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:45:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170110214535.GA21354@sophia> References: <512f7f9909c9ff6964b34e0302eeb404e703f033.1484073325.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <4236ccf5-1480-ea3c-fee6-35ea252e3756@kernel.org> <20170110214535.GA21354@sophia> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:45:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: pc104: Mask PC/104 drivers via the PC104 Kconfig option To: William Breathitt Gray Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Greg KH , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:13:02PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>On 10/01/17 18:51, William Breathitt Gray wrote: >>> PC/104 drivers should be hidden on machines which do not support PC/104 >>> devices. This patch adds the PC104 Kconfig option as a dependency for >>> the relevant PC/104 device driver Kconfig options. >>> >>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron >>> Cc: Hartmut Knaack >>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen >>> Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler >>> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray >>Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron >> >>Now the question is how to merge this one. Let me know if you >>want me to take this one via IIO after the first patch is in. >>If you want to take it another route I'm fine with that. >> >>Jonathan > > This is such a simple patchset that I envision Greg K-H picking up all > three patches via driver-core; however, I'm pretty indifferent about the > ultimate path in the end. I'll leave it up to Greg K-H to decide. As long as Greg merges the first patch we can merge the two others orthogonally I think. It's just Kconfig symbols, not things that break compile. (But I bet someone will come with automated warnings about unused symbols in the kernel...) Yours, Linus Walleij