From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783EEEB64D8 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 18:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232339AbjFMSKL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:10:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51024 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235429AbjFMSJy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:09:54 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1135.google.com (mail-yw1-x1135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A314D1BCD for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1135.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-56ff9cc91b4so5325447b3.0 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:09:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1686679791; x=1689271791; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TESX54vILo0n1pvOdyskuCPzlhG1Qnfeg9SAHlfLO0E=; b=WqJQlDbj84qhqbJnTBjCD2q/ecrppE1AqGXhimErpGbEh6NQ4LNx9h+LXHzDXOSDOp eYRJ/2bJlMnUYfVXwgGBN5ZgYfHrsaiXB/unauuYqhMXIC0uySbiymEoN6UbPq/0n7+U wMnOyVgVrLjfDxJvY9/rZ9/G55dmLMrlIEAMhITPF7m6LaEPMFwld+1w1BfdUuugBUkD 7BZjKuZTDTS04g45c35eZn7WpBD9rJWwXCXCvjtJiA43I8y2112fuIqkdG7OAWo7K6MD C3PwaDBZQmq9/0lzViUGKKraZvkamF7LYDAFj9oJS1yUyK4OKXR4YGhkROgLlVvZf0sF 7xTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686679792; x=1689271792; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TESX54vILo0n1pvOdyskuCPzlhG1Qnfeg9SAHlfLO0E=; b=YLfq1f4lfSnnBVMY/MfioefYnA8iKqtgp3xd58fHqukEdP1Xn4N172+0Av5zzTbArO 19SqtTeneEy05HuLDnGpDMCHEWIIgPaZtPAOW2/LrOmCngoLA13mZ3sEJ2cSIUV04JhR 6uagCnyKVeGi6T6F1wTZ/jiwuNiFwGmyIKmuIgFCj+m6AmFJMmCcPR+VxAcBooF9/kEh L9K8UgY/WhA2nHk462j5kVut/kWZPZRr8UBIn6NKBFTT8Oe9+Sjm22L/UTGSidX+lrL5 7asaW/lSn32hvq/hMs/wDnetwP0sqw8/TzWsD7bq5oSbzNw/77VBfNp6T8hf1769ocH3 fQkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwojFgi4UHyozLUcIQ6o1ZTBWNBBHL+WYF3JzK75zMAgT+66YFx 0jPDU6XIsLwWTq1RJYBpL/74QPcRPNKW6bTM3+J9MQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4gbDPGd/3NVLS7j+rLPJi4AjmZ5nwQ+/jbPcc7n0nq76nZz+kSiGmAsCXrZAwPPSZBCVIp3TDFsllfdqAmOZE= X-Received: by 2002:a25:a506:0:b0:ba8:3613:76a8 with SMTP id h6-20020a25a506000000b00ba8361376a8mr2590951ybi.41.1686679791771; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:09:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230424123522.18302-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <20230601054549.10843-15-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 33/43] dt-bindings: gpio: Add Cirrus EP93xx To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Nikita Shubin , Alexander Sverdlin , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Michael Peters , Kris Bahnsen , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 4:55=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski = wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:41=E2=80=AFAM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 10:20=E2=80=AFAM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > > > Did you choose correct maintainers? Bartosz, Linus, do you take care > > > about EP93xx platform? > > > > I'm fine with it (I have a platform). > > I don't but I'm actually not sure how DT bindings maintainership works > - do GPIO bindings all fall under the GPIO jurisdiction automatically? Not really, more on the people selected by the person writing the bindings, confirmed by them being merged. Traditionally, Linux as the biggest software project with the most active subsystem maintainers do the reviewing and take the responsibility for them. Technically, e.g. BSD people could appear on the devicetree mailinglist and review patches and suggest maintainership from their side, but I haven't seen them much around. Neither Apple Computer or anyone else who ought to be there but isn't. Yours, Linus Walleij