From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750886Ab3CAMax (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:30:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ia0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:41632 "EHLO mail-ia0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750696Ab3CAMaw (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:30:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <009401ce13c9$c01f6400$405e2c00$%han@samsung.com> References: <009401ce13c9$c01f6400$405e2c00$%han@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:30:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: core: use devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() From: Linus Walleij To: Jingoo Han Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > devres_release() can simplify the code, because devres_release() > will call the destructor for the resource as well as freeing > the devres data. > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han Patch applied with Stephen's ACK! Thanks, Linus Walleij