From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752904Ab2AXXNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:13:09 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:43472 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751473Ab2AXXNH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:13:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1327083746-31430-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1327083746-31430-3-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:13:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: tegra: Switch to new pinctrl driver From: Linus Walleij To: Olof Johansson Cc: Stephen Warren , Colin Cross , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Yup, I've just been waiting on things to settle, > bindings/implementation wise. Will look at it over the next day or two > and get back. The only bindings you need to look into for this patch set should be for the driver itself, the other muxmap bindings discussion I would *very* much like to keep orthogonal to the review of this driver. I'm pretty scared of how device tree bindings seem to suck in every discussion like a black hole and then explode in a myriad fragmented discussions like a supernova :-P Yours, Linus Walleij