From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986AbcF2I41 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 04:56:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]:33279 "EHLO mail-ob0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbcF2I4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 04:56:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1467117054-12943-5-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> References: <1467117054-12943-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <1467117054-12943-5-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:56:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: tps65218-gpio: Add platform_device_id table To: Keerthy Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Alexandre Courbot , Lee Jones , Mark Brown , Tony Lindgren , Linux-OMAP , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Input , Rob Herring , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Keerthy wrote: > platform_device_id table is needed for adding the tps65218-gpio > module to the mfd_cell array. > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy > --- > > Changes in v4: > > * Retained the compatible strings in order to interrogate the DT in the > normal way. So do I just apply this or do you need it applied through another tree? It looks standalone, should I just merge it? Acked-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij