From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ACAECAAD1 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231237AbiHaMkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:40:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38702 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230496AbiHaMk3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:40:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB93766133 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id nc14so23170399ejc.4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=MCBuc3iFnBItgcwahvmF8Fyf/yByT2EhRd1eNSiQSjI=; b=ZyGZdtZvlUcVjIqEYoq7QSBtvxtLU54sf8bj9ZWaAW6WJ5+bo/iDixWUKvoWzuj3ah 2kQSxN6F9EdAOXMasrVeA1rvNKYrJG92yU9BQUwRUSiBQOJZwY28qDThBSdcEPh09pHm eaKl5K7VT5xnjIQCn2cquwL/U91c8cfvCkWezWaL11HuJp835rN+qdEJ3IN2kwz+yKk1 EVz8rhUXBiBGiVq16atOcvL5MJlq1zv1NNfZ5ld2Jt8MSKzFGT55/j1m3kq2GUjY0gVA 2jh4hutLkDQhnU+QXtX+LDVJrFEeCxa4rJzWIgx7cJX5o6n7NC1WAFTVpN6IBhbqBasa aOfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=MCBuc3iFnBItgcwahvmF8Fyf/yByT2EhRd1eNSiQSjI=; b=BAaZvZGbXe3fMENwEQ1eSz6QH0nNholp+JtHLvhLg1I/AOCXb/tyRT9mAewyap9VCz SMqD3oH3Ebmu6PyYwsQBAk+Br4xy0nk3QV0XYE2g94oWWUgQ1xrf9WPZKOSW2pLnKe9l HTEOy7qRn+DkdVpV0GhBUOU4xRWNlMsRwBtb6jCSk8YsRYChaz24zuLYQm9X33Usv78C 7wH0FHH1zaT0hBPK+gMXBlT/doe1e0B4VGFIyXhLQYp0485VdgDDqNL52JvoIkm4K2vq edU7wmQKI5MSDBB/ylZEogF2sVoHoz+pqUs6/XarmlTfAIJMIat+IRpRLhm74VuplEBI a9yg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3+4fts9++w3U86X9Uwb81qZu6vepfIfOAe9rOJ2nSyapjWHpA2 ZH+tJE8dy17TtjhpK0enOvuJG07RQ6op3EtTKmb04A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5VjKGidDtLFEn1Gq6NqN0WGj/6ZAB+3gykERCjjCMt8W2xZ7MD4XByi6+Z9ZCivVK/Tp40Ki+UZvj+ZFT5okg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c89:b0:741:4453:75be with SMTP id nb9-20020a1709071c8900b00741445375bemr14289735ejc.208.1661949625872; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:40:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220825094132.1268174-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20220825094132.1268174-3-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20220829144032.GC24324@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20220829144032.GC24324@pengutronix.de> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:40:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add gpio-latch binding document To: Sascha Hauer Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , kernel@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 4:40 PM Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Hm I wanted to just call these "gpios" but that is maybe confusing. > > What about "latch-gpios"? > > Hm, the clk input is used to latch the current state of the inputs to > the outputs, so "latch-gpios" might even be confused with the GPIO > routed to the clk unput of the latch. Overall, the whole thing is a > latch, so "latch-gpios" doesn't sound like a good name to distinguish > the different types of inputs of a latch. I still like data-gpios best > as these lines are described as "Data inputs" in my 74273 data sheet. How about "latched-gpios" (notice the "d") It makes some semantic sense. But I will not nitpick, data is fine, just a bit unspecific. Yours, Linus Walleij