From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7377C43144 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F9626618 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="dZgoHoss" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 53F9626618 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752692AbeFZHdt (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 03:33:49 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:51478 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752253AbeFZHds (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 03:33:48 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id 128-v6so839323itf.1 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:33:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k7EvucRpwFo0YlzzBs/PE2D4RLsvRqZn96d0dR/qlWI=; b=dZgoHossziaJkSlcns9voRDJcFQTzbKjFe/Z2P4h5HAsopw7Hr08uItbRXUgTJ/Xou OFaKvdEPXbgrY6fiCn4ThCAXvdYGQBsTq09XDioo19KcwNmtinom87Gl1gORP+OmInzo dVOFPK0dj3yHIREJYPDrywzf4AHwK9z+DtXPU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k7EvucRpwFo0YlzzBs/PE2D4RLsvRqZn96d0dR/qlWI=; b=TXFmRwyMfwBXWdCeftGdynVFtpZjyU+ogc0/niOGJWdfTpN59kID8neHMpuPHbaDL7 C4LcdRm9zAqwz43trc8jub+4rrRnkUFZaEq6c4s7TgvfEBtclCE8pGBTb8tM24HIOj9W U96HXnfBgmnX65LoBso7qnph6YUoFkMZ+t+GsbC26X1xWLnDXk9IfRlijB5CXfZKC603 3fDeFvlYZY9X5/toSGiDCtHQSlt7P/tx/o7FbDkAYpfPRf9GOJ5WK5rnSlKXOmdZADE1 iDeNfcnZ+J5MpgRpZj5Xx7mwDjq6ybwi8Q37PdD0cQ1Zz1V3YXpJAESu+LDaiO5Q+2hT p3Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1PdH4YPQ1n9IUZ4P/G4QRN72rlLjsa2TvUEQFo7GEAU2mdmzzB ivsNmhSj3GbTL7dQ5i30Cq7k91zreLlgbo/Pvz03bG+z X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpey8vandYy8Y2no0MfAyvYAYk6OxErYhNZauKgoxZQrTbYGRmNUp6gwzb5qkEHIvWngHCKI7Y6EdQ2jz4PHk0c= X-Received: by 2002:a24:5746:: with SMTP id u67-v6mr540508ita.38.1529998427736; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:33:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180621185442.17086-1-geert@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <20180621185442.17086-1-geert@linux-m68k.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:33:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The GPIO subsystem provides dummy GPIO consumer functions if GPIOLIB is > not enabled. Hence drivers that depend on GPIOLIB, but use GPIO consumer > functionality only, can still be compiled if GPIOLIB is not enabled. > > Relax the dependency on GPIOLIB if COMPILE_TEST is enabled, where > appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov > --- > v3: > - Add Acked-by, I think my last change to w1 I just put into the GPIO tree. Should I simply carry this patch in the GPIO tree? Yours, Linus Walleij