From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753029AbdF2MrR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:47:17 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:35507 "EHLO mail-io0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752807AbdF2MrJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:47:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170623230404.2283-1-Ismail.Kose@maximintegrated.com> References: <20170623230404.2283-1-Ismail.Kose@maximintegrated.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:47:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: dac: DS4424: add Maxim DS4422/DS4424 DAC driver support To: Ismail Kose Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , William Breathitt Gray , Jean-Francois Dagenais , Fabrice Gasnier , gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com, Peter Rosin , maxime.roussinbelanger@gmail.com, ihkose@gmail.com, "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Ismail Kose wrote: > +Optional properties: > + - vcc-supply: Power supply us optional. If not defined, driver will ignore it. *is* optional I guess. No need to mention the driver. > +#include (...) > + struct regulator *vcc_reg; > + const char *vcc_reg_name; > + bool regulator_state; Why do you do this funky stuff? > +int ds4424_regulator_onoff(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool enable) > +{ > + struct ds4424_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (data->vcc_reg == NULL) > + return ret; This should not happen. You get dummy regulators or stubs if the regulator is not there and that works just fine. > + > + if (data->regulator_state == PWR_OFF && enable == PWR_ON) { > + ret = regulator_enable(data->vcc_reg); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s - enable vcc_reg failed, ret=%d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + goto done; > + } > + } else if (data->regulator_state == PWR_ON && enable == PWR_OFF) { > + ret = regulator_disable(data->vcc_reg); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("%s - disable vcc_reg failed, ret=%d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + goto done; > + } > + } > + > + data->regulator_state = enable; > +done: > + return ret; > +} The regulator already has a state and knows if it is on or off. Why do you insist on having a "regulator state" reinventing the wheel in the driver? > + ret = of_property_read_string(node, "vcc-supply", &data->vcc_reg_name); > + if (ret < 0) { > + pr_info("DAC vcc-supply is not available in dts\n"); > + data->vcc_reg_name = NULL; > + } Don't do this. Just try to get the regulator by name and do not try to be clever about this, the regulator core will give you a dummy supply if the regulator is not there. > + if (data->vcc_reg_name) { Just skip this check. > + data->vcc_reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, > + data->vcc_reg_name); Just data->vcc_reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vcc"); > + if (IS_ERR(data->vcc_reg)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(data->vcc_reg); > + dev_err(&client->dev, > + "Failed to get vcc_reg regulator: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } And keep this. You will get a dummy or stub working just fine if the regulator is not there. > + ret = ds4424_regulator_onoff(indio_dev, PWR_ON); > + if (ret < 0) { > + pr_err("Unable to turn on the regulator. %s:%d, ret: %d\n", > + __func__, __LINE__, ret); > + return ret; > + } I don't think this helper is even needed. Just enable it here. Disable it on the other paths. Problem solved. Yours, Linus Walleij