From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753039AbeDSNn1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:43:27 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:40669 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752499AbeDSNnY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:43:24 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+ga+npJPbM3RuOKW7v5U3zHpIOEjOWo49zAco+7oue/P24RTUGCjlrTkPFctRGRG6j6/RifDKBBgzu4NB7+IQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180213110631.o3zn5bifvypofsyg@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180212131717.27193-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180212131717.27193-6-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20180213110631.o3zn5bifvypofsyg@localhost.localdomain> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:43:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Look up a descriptor and pass to the core To: Charles Keepax Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Richard Fitzgerald Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:17:01PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Instead of passing a global GPIO number, pass a descriptor looked >> up with the standard devm_gpiod_get_optional() call. >> >> We have augmented the GPIO core to look up the regulator special >> GPIO "wlf,ldoena" in a separate patch. >> >> Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com >> Cc: Richard Fitzgerald >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij >> --- >> drivers/regulator/arizona-ldo1.c | 19 ++++++------------- >> include/linux/regulator/arizona-ldo1.h | 3 --- >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> > > Does this patch not also need to update the hookups in > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410-module.c? There is > wm5102_reva_pdata and wm5102_pdata both of which use the ldoena > you are removing here? OK fixed this! > Also looking at this more you will need to you > devm_gpio_get_from_of_node here since the device tree binding is > for wlf,ldoena not wlf,ldoena-gpio. So this patch currently > breaks the binding. Actually not, because I fixed that in the special quirk patch 6a537d48461d "gpio: of: Support regulator nonstandard GPIO properties" as mentioned in the commit message. (Will clarify.) Yours, Linus Walleij