From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64265C43460 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34458613CD for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232403AbhEEMw0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 08:52:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230199AbhEEMwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 08:52:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8072CC061574 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e12so2306664ljn.2 for ; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5ZKINt+24vkgq+jtEeRzmpva+N3VhWpG25a6HCCDQLg=; b=lsqTsl7XXHy6S6on3u5XAyk4I5ko7hEiejMokpIADhU8TTGOHuBxi28EfYt8Jf7FV/ OnGwPXxfbb2dKPzov0N0V6NLD0nonHQEVWfTyW02sRnjp85USPGekyOLAQKJFWp9fF8E hqkQ/ym/tBF1B6XEQnez1qYEpgs7V6bTtplIPN8B/Ji0Uc1VvPaIIJbB6dxkhLrH3AqL 3UtMnEuE9F6FZUX2A6rX80PBuBmh84a54AcIhfZ3QZ8F4adFMGl4Pe5TjEyqDS5EGFmn on3hpo4FRiMNfsvx4bzbW3vZtc2TN6Ndl2ZTM44H5dPIxkf925BYAYWpGTMK9970dbWN jpDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5ZKINt+24vkgq+jtEeRzmpva+N3VhWpG25a6HCCDQLg=; b=W2mMpg2pcEwA0/Mv0k9Ph1UoUfwFuXBluTwX3RXSs+VRUVZeu4lWWxEKxF4OJa+iRC Gi4wYyFyWcsF231MV/dwp8J+rKWAZhIwwUe3R50LiDPx3aRbXxjpqro34Y3clg5cRksh 7qoy5YYPkNYhyGEvOUGlCwNkTfdO5px3I2eTuDO/N3P6xh1Q7Bt9dWof4eovzg60puu/ X05nlIuQ/f/jGQTIRzpKbdC9sKKnJJJvX8fMgQnhQeK3+CDvDuUSuTqdXn0A/dp4hjT7 gAV7/Kd+RfAOk+yWDUd7NB+1B0aPv/OixgR0hgvAXYxw5Bx/zmnm2B12dbwW5Zh4lZTI wUqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zHe4OvxkJf0LsaB70bzc6qojycFfnUVkrWrqMb+IrAv7cBgUh VSdMBs7b8J85zPvl6N6JdwVmRrjyP5YJd/Bdf7u7Qw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQJiePbgT7/Tp3x1+jnfQmk7ukJ4HB+fh/IcgCx7MW+Kkyq/ARSBbLSXWU82nXtNazzReNnDeM6ZGufQXDZ/A= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a54c:: with SMTP id e12mr21964567ljn.326.1620219086062; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:51:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210423165906.2504169-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20210423095743.v5.1.I9e6af2529d6c61e5daf86a15a1211121c5223b9a@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 14:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/20] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add missing pm_runtime_disable() calls To: Doug Anderson Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Laurent Pinchart , Bjorn Andersson , Neil Armstrong , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Sam Ravnborg , Wolfram Sang , MSM , Rob Clark , Stanislav Lisovskiy , Stephen Boyd , Steev Klimaszewski , Maarten Lankhorst , linux-i2c , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:41 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > > At your convenience and when you think there is too little > > stuff in your sn65dsi86 TODO, check out > > pinctrl-bcm63xx.c for an example of select GPIO_REGMAP > > made very simple (this works fine as long as they are bit > > offsets starting from 0). > > I seem to recall you mentioning something like this. When I looked at > it in the past I wasn't convinced it would be easy. See my response > [2]. The rough summary is that I didn't think the helpers were happy > with the pm_runtime() model that I'm using. Did I get that wrong? Yeah good point. It does seem a bit too complex for that. Sorry for not remembering. Yours, Linus Walleij