From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758068Ab1LNThv (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:37:51 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:65334 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758011Ab1LNThu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:37:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176B446FFA@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1323431857-8828-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <010201ccba2e$9b4564e0$d1d02ea0$%park@samsung.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF176B446FFA@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:37:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] pinctrl: add a pin config interface From: Linus Walleij To: Stephen Warren Cc: Chanho Park , Linus Walleij , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Shawn Guo , Thomas Abraham , Dong Aisheng , Rajendra Nayak , Haojian Zhuang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > I thought we already discussed making pin names mandatory, > which seems to avoid most of Chanho's objections? I came up with a patch that conjures pin names on the form PIN42 if no name is passed in by the pin descriptors... Better than disallowing passing NULL strings I think, it looks useful. Yours, Linus Walleij