From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932738AbbLVKX3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:23:29 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:36843 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810AbbLVKX1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:23:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450412497-25872-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> References: <1450412497-25872-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:23:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall From: Linus Walleij To: Daniel Kurtz Cc: Matthias Brugger , Fabio Estevam , Hongzhou Yang , Yingjoe Chen , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Fabian Frederick , Maoguang Meng , Axel Lin , Patrice Chotard , "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find > their pctldev without probe deferring. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this? Or should it be applied? Yours, Linus Walleij