From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>, lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"lkp@lists.01.org" <lkp@lists.01.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [mm/slub] 3616799128: BUG_kmalloc-#(Not_tainted):kmalloc_Redzone_overwritten
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YEtmvR2KOW5P0VtbHatxdY7MT22hp9FrUOyjZiKR+BJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YujWZzctbp1Bq25N@feng-skl>
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 09:47, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:23:23PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > On 8/1/22 08:21, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > > Cc kansan mail list.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is really related with KASAN debug, that in free path, some
> > > > > kmalloc redzone ([orig_size+1, object_size]) area is written by
> > > > > kasan to save free meta info.
> > > > >
> > > > > The callstack is:
> > > > >
> > > > > kfree
> > > > > slab_free
> > > > > slab_free_freelist_hook
> > > > > slab_free_hook
> > > > > __kasan_slab_free
> > > > > ____kasan_slab_free
> > > > > kasan_set_free_info
> > > > > kasan_set_track
> > > > >
> > > > > And this issue only happens with "kmalloc-16" slab. Kasan has 2
> > > > > tracks: alloc_track and free_track, for x86_64 test platform, most
> > > > > of the slabs will reserve space for alloc_track, and reuse the
> > > > > 'object' area for free_track. The kasan free_track is 16 bytes
> > > > > large, that it will occupy the whole 'kmalloc-16's object area,
> > > > > so when kmalloc-redzone is enabled by this patch, the 'overwritten'
> > > > > error is triggered.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it won't hurt other kmalloc slabs, as kasan's free meta won't
> > > > > conflict with kmalloc-redzone which stay in the latter part of
> > > > > kmalloc area.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the solution I can think of is:
> > > > > * skip the kmalloc-redzone for kmalloc-16 only, or
> > > > > * skip kmalloc-redzone if kasan is enabled, or
> > > > > * let kasan reserve the free meta (16 bytes) outside of object
> > > > > just like for alloc meta
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we could add some hack that if both kasan and SLAB_STORE_USER is
> > > > enabled, we bump the stored orig_size from <16 to 16? Similar to what
> > > > __ksize() does.
> > >
> > > How about the following patch:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index added2653bb0..33bbac2afaef 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -830,6 +830,16 @@ static inline void set_orig_size(struct kmem_cache *s,
> > > if (!slub_debug_orig_size(s))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > > + /*
> > > + * When kasan is enabled, it could save its free meta data in the
> > > + * start part of object area, so skip the kmalloc redzone check
> > > + * for small kmalloc slabs to avoid the data conflict.
> > > + */
> > > + if (s->object_size <= 32)
> > > + orig_size = s->object_size;
> > > +#endif
I think this can be done only when CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC.
Only CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC stores free meta info in objects:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/kasan/common.c#L176
And KASAN_HW_TAGS has chances of being enabled with DEBUG_SLUB in
real-world uses (with Arm MTE).
> > > +
> > > p += get_info_end(s);
> > > p += sizeof(struct track) * 2;
> > >
> > > I extend the size to 32 for potential's kasan meta data size increase.
> > > This is tested locally, if people are OK with it, I can ask for 0Day's
> > > help to verify this.
> >
> > Where is set_orig_size() function defined? Don't see it upstream nor
> > in linux-next.
> > This looks fine but my only concern is that this should not increase
> > memory consumption when slub debug tracking is not enabled, which
> > should be the main operation mode when KASAN is enabled. But I can't
> > figure this out w/o context.
>
> Yes, the patchset was only posted on LKML, and not in any tree now.
> The link to the original patches is:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220727071042.8796-1-feng.tang@intel.com/t/
Lots of code...
This SLAB_STORE_USER seems to be set on all kmalloc slabs by default
when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is enabled, right?
And KASAN enables CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, this means that this is stored
always when KASAN is enabled? Looks wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-27 7:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/slub: some debug enhancements Feng Tang
2022-07-27 7:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-07-27 10:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-07-27 12:59 ` Feng Tang
2022-07-27 14:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-27 7:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-07-27 7:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/slub: extend redzone check to cover extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
2022-07-31 6:53 ` [mm/slub] 3616799128: BUG_kmalloc-#(Not_tainted):kmalloc_Redzone_overwritten kernel test robot
2022-07-31 8:16 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-01 6:21 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-01 7:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-01 7:48 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-01 8:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-08-01 14:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-02 6:54 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02 7:06 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-02 7:46 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02 7:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2022-08-02 8:44 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02 9:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-02 10:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-02 13:36 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02 14:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-04 6:28 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-04 10:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-04 12:22 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-15 7:27 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-16 13:27 ` Oliver Sang
2022-08-16 14:12 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02 10:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-08-02 6:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACT4Y+YEtmvR2KOW5P0VtbHatxdY7MT22hp9FrUOyjZiKR+BJw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).