linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Port KASAN Tests to KUnit
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 07:39:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YTNZRfKLH1=FibrtGj34MY=naDJY6GWVnpMvgShSLFhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFsvULZqJT3-NxYLsCaHpxemBCdyZN7nFTuQM40096UGqVzgQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:56 AM Patricia Alfonso
<trishalfonso@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:19 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > .On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:44 AM Patricia Alfonso
> > > -       pr_info("out-of-bounds in copy_from_user()\n");
> > > -       unused = copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1);
> >
> > Why is all of this removed?
> > Most of these tests are hard earned and test some special corner cases.
> >
> I just moved it inside IS_MODULE(CONFIG_TEST_KASAN) instead because I
> don't think there is a way to rewrite this without it being a module.

You mean these are unconditionally crashing the machine? If yes,
please add a comment about this.

Theoretically we could have a notion of "death tests" similar to gunit:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3698718/what-are-google-test-death-tests
KUnit test runner wrapper would need to spawn a separete process per
each such test. Under non-KUnit test runner these should probably be
disabled by default and only run if specifically requested (a-la
--gunit_filter/--gunit_also_run_disabled_tests).
Could also be used to test other things that unconditionally panic,
e.g. +Kees may be happy for unit tests for some of the
hardening/fortification features.
I am not asking to bundle this with this change of course.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-01  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27  2:43 [RFC PATCH 1/2] Port KASAN Tests to KUnit Patricia Alfonso
2020-02-27  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] KUnit: KASAN Integration Patricia Alfonso
2020-02-27 14:04   ` Alan Maguire
2020-02-29  0:46     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-03 16:40       ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-05  2:14         ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-05  7:46           ` Alan Maguire
2020-03-10 21:42             ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-10 21:42               ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-10 21:39     ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-10 21:39       ` Brendan Higgins
2020-02-27 14:39   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-29  1:09     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-01  6:26       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-27 14:43   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-29  1:23     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-01  6:29       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-04  1:26         ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-04  6:23           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-05  0:07             ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-05  6:44               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-27 14:45   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-29  0:49     ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-04  6:35   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-27 13:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Port KASAN Tests to KUnit Andrey Konovalov
2020-02-27 15:16   ` Alan Maguire
2020-02-27 14:19 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-02-29  1:56   ` Patricia Alfonso
2020-03-01  6:39     ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2020-03-02 17:52       ` Kees Cook
2020-03-02 22:36         ` Brendan Higgins
2020-03-02 23:02           ` Kees Cook
2020-03-06 23:58   ` Patricia Alfonso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACT4Y+YTNZRfKLH1=FibrtGj34MY=naDJY6GWVnpMvgShSLFhg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=trishalfonso@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).