linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:23:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YYyw8bz8TgCJPF3mvDuipzs53gsAcj+8rgC42H2y58vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1517246437.git.dvyukov@google.com>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> KASAN uses compiler instrumentation to intercept all memory accesses.
> But it does not see memory accesses done in assembly code.
> One notable user of assembly code is atomic operations. Frequently,
> for example, an atomic reference decrement is the last access to an
> object and a good candidate for a racy use-after-free.
>
> Atomic operations are defined in arch files, but KASAN instrumentation
> is required for several archs that support KASAN. Later we will need
> similar hooks for KMSAN (uninit use detector) and KTSAN (data race
> detector).
>
> This change introduces wrappers around atomic operations that can be
> used to add KASAN/KMSAN/KTSAN instrumentation across several archs,
> and adds KASAN checks to them.
>
> This patch uses the wrappers only for x86 arch. Arm64 will be switched
> later. And we also plan to instrument bitops in a similar way.
>
> Within a day it has found its first bug:
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_dec_and_test
> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:123 [inline] at addr ffff880079c30158
> Write of size 4 by task syz-executor6/25698
> CPU: 2 PID: 25698 Comm: syz-executor6 Not tainted 4.10.0+ #302
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/kasan.c:344
>  atomic_dec_and_test arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:123 [inline]
>  put_task_struct include/linux/sched/task.h:93 [inline]
>  put_ctx+0xcf/0x110 kernel/events/core.c:1131
>  perf_event_release_kernel+0x3ad/0xc90 kernel/events/core.c:4322
>  perf_release+0x37/0x50 kernel/events/core.c:4338
>  __fput+0x332/0x800 fs/file_table.c:209
>  ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:245
>  task_work_run+0x197/0x260 kernel/task_work.c:116
>  exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [inline]
>  do_exit+0xb38/0x29c0 kernel/exit.c:880
>  do_group_exit+0x149/0x420 kernel/exit.c:984
>  get_signal+0x7e0/0x1820 kernel/signal.c:2318
>  do_signal+0xd2/0x2190 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:808
>  exit_to_usermode_loop+0x200/0x2a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:157
>  syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:191 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x6fc/0x930 arch/x86/entry/common.c:286
>  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> RIP: 0033:0x4458d9
> RSP: 002b:00007f3f07187cf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
> RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000007080c8 RCX: 00000000004458d9
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000007080c8
> RBP: 00000000007080a8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f3f071889c0 R15: 00007f3f07188700
> Object at ffff880079c30140, in cache task_struct size: 5376
> Allocated:
> PID = 25681
>  kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x122/0x6f0 mm/slab.c:3662
>  alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:153 [inline]
>  dup_task_struct kernel/fork.c:495 [inline]
>  copy_process.part.38+0x19c8/0x4aa0 kernel/fork.c:1560
>  copy_process kernel/fork.c:1531 [inline]
>  _do_fork+0x200/0x1010 kernel/fork.c:1994
>  SYSC_clone kernel/fork.c:2104 [inline]
>  SyS_clone+0x37/0x50 kernel/fork.c:2098
>  do_syscall_64+0x2e8/0x930 arch/x86/entry/common.c:281
>  return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a
> Freed:
> PID = 25681
>  __cache_free mm/slab.c:3514 [inline]
>  kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x240 mm/slab.c:3774
>  free_task_struct kernel/fork.c:158 [inline]
>  free_task+0x151/0x1d0 kernel/fork.c:370
>  copy_process.part.38+0x18e5/0x4aa0 kernel/fork.c:1931
>  copy_process kernel/fork.c:1531 [inline]
>  _do_fork+0x200/0x1010 kernel/fork.c:1994
>  SYSC_clone kernel/fork.c:2104 [inline]
>  SyS_clone+0x37/0x50 kernel/fork.c:2098
>  do_syscall_64+0x2e8/0x930 arch/x86/entry/common.c:281
>  return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a
>
> Changes since v1:
>  - dropped "x86: remove unused atomic_inc_short()" patch
>    it is mailed separately
>  - rebased on top of tip/locking/core head
>  - other changes noted within individual patches
>
> Changes since v2:
>  - rebased on top of tip/locking/core head
>  - dropped a pervasive "x86: use long long for 64-bit atomic ops" commit,
>    instead use s64 type in wrappers
>  - added "x86: use s64* for old arg of atomic64_try_cmpxchg()" commit
>
> Changes since v3 are noted in individual commits.
>
> Changes since v4:
>  - rebased on tip/locking/core HEAD
>
> Changes since v5:
>  - rework cmpxchg* implementations so that we have less
>    code in macros and more code in functions

Some context.
This revives a half-year old patch. v5 of this was applied to
tip/locking/core, but then reverted due to a reported crash:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kasan-dev/ZJl66N7smmk/lJY99HmmAgAJ

The root cause was in the cmpxchg macros:

#define cmpxchg64(ptr, old, new)                       \
({                                                     \
       __typeof__(ptr) ____ptr = (ptr);                \
       kasan_check_write(____ptr, sizeof(*____ptr));   \
       arch_cmpxchg64(____ptr, (old), (new));          \
})

I had to introduce the new ____ptr variable, so that
kasan_check_write() and arch_cmpxchg64() don't evaluate ptr twice. But
there are multiple layers of macros and ____ptr ended up referring to
something else (to itself).

v6 changes cmpxchg macros to (as was suggested by Mark and Thomas):

static __always_inline unsigned long
cmpxchg_size(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
{
        kasan_check_write(ptr, size);
        switch (size) {
        case 1:
                return arch_cmpxchg((u8 *)ptr, (u8)old, (u8)new);
        case 2:
                return arch_cmpxchg((u16 *)ptr, (u16)old, (u16)new);
        case 4:
                return arch_cmpxchg((u32 *)ptr, (u32)old, (u32)new);
        case 8:
                BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != 8);
                return arch_cmpxchg((u64 *)ptr, (u64)old, (u64)new);
        }
        BUILD_BUG();
        return 0;
}

#define cmpxchg(ptr, old, new)                                                \
({                                                                        \
        ((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_size((ptr), (unsigned long)(old),        \
                (unsigned long)(new), sizeof(*(ptr))));                        \
})

Otherwise the patch series were rebased without any conflicts (surprisingly).

There is now some duplication between cmpxchg_size, cmpxchg_local_size
and sync_cmpxchg_size, but I thought that employing more macros while
trying to resolve macro mess bugs is not the best idea.



> Tested:
>  - build/boot x86_64 defconfig
>  - build/boot x86_64 defconfig+KASAN
>  - build i686/powerpc defconfig
>
> Dmitry Vyukov (4):
>   locking/atomic: Add asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h
>   x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h
>   asm-generic: add KASAN instrumentation to atomic operations
>   asm-generic, x86: add comments for atomic instrumentation
>
>  arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h             | 106 +++----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h        | 106 +++----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h        | 108 +++----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h            |  12 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h         |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_64.h         |   4 +-
>  include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h | 476 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 652 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h
>
> --
> 2.16.0.rc1.238.g530d649a79-goog
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-30  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-29 17:26 [PATCH v6 0/4] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] locking/atomic: Add asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-12 12:24   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic/x86: Switch " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] asm-generic: add KASAN instrumentation to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-12 12:24   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic, asm-generic: Add " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-29 17:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] asm-generic, x86: add comments for atomic instrumentation Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-12 12:25   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic, asm-generic, x86: Add " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-30  9:23 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2018-01-30  9:27   ` [PATCH v6 0/4] x86, kasan: add KASAN checks to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-30 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2018-01-31  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-31  8:53     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-31 16:17       ` Will Deacon
2018-02-07 14:17         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-02-20 10:40           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-02-26 12:52             ` Dmitry Vyukov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-17  9:15 [PATCH v4 0/7] " Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] x86: un-macro-ify atomic ops implementation Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-22 11:04   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic/x86: Un-macro-ify " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2017-07-25 13:54   ` tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] x86: use s64* for old arg of atomic64_try_cmpxchg() Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-22 11:04   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic/x86: Use 's64 *' for 'old' argument " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2017-07-25 13:55   ` tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] asm-generic: add atomic-instrumented.h Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-19 10:50   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-22 11:05   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic: Add asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2018-03-12 12:23   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic, asm-generic: " tip-bot for Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] kasan: allow kasan_check_read/write() to accept pointers to volatiles Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-19 10:50   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-19 13:11     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-22  8:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 14:15         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] asm-generic: add KASAN instrumentation to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-19 10:51   ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-17  9:15 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] asm-generic, x86: add comments for atomic instrumentation Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-19 10:54   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACT4Y+YYyw8bz8TgCJPF3mvDuipzs53gsAcj+8rgC42H2y58vw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).