From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758923AbcLARs6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:48:58 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:32901 "EHLO mail-lf0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758747AbcLARsw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:48:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161201173438.bfe5eq23i6ezfxsq@treble> References: <20161129181300.GA29095@sbauer-Z170X-UD5> <20161130183507.syv3cdpp3hzxi77k@treble> <20161130190217.GA2756@sbauer-Z170X-UD5> <20161130231011.ofmbmevn3hqasetz@treble> <8f4c4a62-d912-0cd9-3462-8df20a868834@virtuozzo.com> <20161201145821.imkcgizo4thmiei2@treble> <20161201164551.52xlcftamleam6vq@treble> <20161201171306.swnvi4f2ezavloxd@treble> <20161201173438.bfe5eq23i6ezfxsq@treble> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/suspend: fix false positive KASAN warning on suspend/resume To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Scott Bauer , "x86@kernel.org" , Alexander Potapenko , kasan-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On 12/01/2016 02:10 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> >> >> > > Resuming from a suspend operation is showing a KASAN false positive >> >> >> > > warning: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > KASAN instrumentation poisons the stack when entering a function and >> >> >> > > unpoisons it when exiting the function. However, in the suspend path, >> >> >> > > some functions never return, so their stack never gets unpoisoned, >> >> >> > > resulting in stale KASAN shadow data which can cause false positive >> >> >> > > warnings like the one above. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Reported-by: Scott Bauer >> >> >> > > Tested-by: Scott Bauer >> >> >> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf >> >> >> > > --- >> >> >> > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 3 +++ >> >> >> > > include/linux/kasan.h | 7 +++++++ >> >> >> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c >> >> >> > > index 4858733..62bd046 100644 >> >> >> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c >> >> >> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c >> >> >> > > @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void) >> >> >> > > pause_graph_tracing(); >> >> >> > > do_suspend_lowlevel(); >> >> >> > > unpause_graph_tracing(); >> >> >> > > + >> >> >> > > + kasan_unpoison_stack_below_sp(); >> >> >> > > + >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I think this might be too late. We may hit stale poison in the first C function called >> >> >> > after resume (restore_processor_state()). Thus the shadow must be unpoisoned prior such call, >> >> >> > i.e. somewhere in do_suspend_lowlevel() after .Lresume_point. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, I think you're right. Will spin a v2. >> >> > >> >> > So I tried calling kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below() from >> >> > do_suspend_lowlevel(), but it hung on the resume. Presumably because >> >> > restore_processor_state() does some important setup which would be >> >> > needed before calling into kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below(). For >> >> > example, setting up the gs register. So it's a bit of a catch-22. >> >> > >> >> > It could probably be fixed properly by rewriting do_suspend_lowlevel() >> >> > to call restore_processor_state() with the temporary stack before >> >> > switching to the original stack and doing the unpoison. >> >> > >> >> > (And there are some other issues with do_suspend_lowlevel() and I'd love >> >> > to try taking a scalpel to it. But I have too many knives in the air >> >> > already to want to try to attempt that right now...) >> >> > >> >> > Unless somebody else wants to take a stab at it, my original patch is >> >> > probably good enough for now, since restore_processor_state() doesn't >> >> > seem to be triggering any KASAN warnings. >> >> >> >> restore_processor_state/__restore_processor_state does not seem to >> >> have any local variables, so KASAN does not do any stack checks there. >> > >> > Actually, looking at the object code, it uses a lot of stack space and >> > has several calls to __asan_report_load*() functions. Probably due to >> > inlining of other functions which have stack variables. >> >> That can be loads of heap variables (or other non-stack data). KASAN >> will emit these checks for lots of loads, but they don't necessary go >> to stack. > > I also see the stack poisoning instructions: > > 54f: 49 c1 ee 03 shr $0x3,%r14 > 553: 4c 01 f0 add %r14,%rax > 556: c7 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 movl $0xf1f1f1f1,(%rax) > 55c: c7 40 04 00 00 f4 f4 movl $0xf4f40000,0x4(%rax) > 563: c7 40 08 f3 f3 f3 f3 movl $0xf3f3f3f3,0x8(%rax) OK, then we are in trouble potentially. It may work as long as as the stack region that is used for local vars in restore_processor_state() does not contain any stale poisoning. But it can break at any moment. Have you tried kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below() or kasan_unpoison_shadow()? I can see how kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below() can hang (it at least uses current). But kasan_unpoison_shadow() is quite trivial, it computes shadow address with simple math and writes zeroes there. >> >> We could disable KASAN instrumentation of the file, or of particular >> >> functions. >> > >> > I don't think that would be sufficient unless it were disabled for >> > __restore_processor_state() and all the functions it calls (and the >> > functions they call, etc), which wouldn't necessarily be >> > straightforward. >> > >> >> Or we could call kasan_unpoison_shadow() on the stack range >> >> before switching to it. >> > >> > I tried that already, but it hung because restore_processor_state() >> > hadn't been called yet (the catch-22 I mentioned aboved). >> >> Ah, I see, we just can't execute normal C code at that point... > > Right. > > -- > Josh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to kasan-dev@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20161201173438.bfe5eq23i6ezfxsq%40treble. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.