From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754228AbcE3Hxs (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 03:53:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:33595 "EHLO mail-lf0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011AbcE3Hxq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 03:53:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160530021758.GG1689@yexl-desktop> References: <20160530021758.GG1689@yexl-desktop> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 09:53:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lkp] [mm] 55834c5909: boot-slabinfo.num_objs +31.9% increasement To: kernel test robot Cc: Alexander Potapenko , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrey Konovalov , Andrey Ryabinin , Steven Rostedt , Konstantin Serebryany , Dmitry Chernenkov , Andrew Morton , LKML , lkp@01.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:17 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed boot-slabinfo.num_objs +31.9% increasement due to commit: > > commit 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e55832b67facdcf ("mm: kasan: initial memory quarantine implementation") > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > in testcase: boot > on test machine: vm-lkp-wsx03-2G: 2 threads qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host with 2G memory > with following parameters: sleep=1 > > > Details are as below: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > ========================================================================================= > compiler/kconfig/rootfs/sleep/tbox_group/testcase: > gcc-6/x86_64-randconfig-s4-05280557/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/1/vm-lkp-wsx03-2G/boot > > commit: > b8f1a75d61d8405a753380c6fb17ba84a5603cd4 > 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e55832b67facdcf > > b8f1a75d61d8405a 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e > ---------------- -------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 165450 ± 0% +31.9% 218176 ± 1% boot-slabinfo.num_objs > 19095 ± 5% +104.3% 39013 ± 3% boot-slabinfo.num_pages > 107.27 ± 2% +14.1% 122.43 ± 13% boot-time.boot > 97.13 ± 1% +4.3% 101.31 ± 1% boot-time.idle > 1105076 ± 0% -7.2% 1025056 ± 0% boot-meminfo.MemFree > 36269 ± 12% +215.7% 114517 ± 5% boot-meminfo.SUnreclaim > 76469 ± 5% +104.5% 156343 ± 4% boot-meminfo.Slab > > > > boot-slabinfo.num_objs > > 230000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | O O | > 220000 ++O O O OO OO O O OO OO | > OO O OOOO O OOOOOOO O O OO O | > 210000 ++ | > | | > 200000 ++ | > | | > 190000 ++ | > | | > 180000 ++ | > | | > 170000 ++ | > ******************************************************************** > 160000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > boot-slabinfo.num_pages > > 45000 ++-------------O----------------------------------------------------+ > | O O OO O O O O OOO | > 40000 +O OOO OO OO O O | > O OO O O O O O OO O O | > | O O O | > 35000 ++ | > | | > 30000 ++ | > | | > 25000 ++ | > | | > | * * * > 20000 +* * * ** * * * * * * ** **** ** * * * * * * :: * *** *| > * * ** ** * * ** *** * ** *** * * * * * ** *** * ** ** ** * * | > 15000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > [*] bisect-good sample > [O] bisect-bad sample Hi Xiaolong, It is with CONFIG_KASAN=y? If yes, then increased memory usage is expected.