From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF908C433FE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 07:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230344AbiJFHfr (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2022 03:35:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57644 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230346AbiJFHfi (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2022 03:35:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B6F80EBE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 00:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id p5so1208283ljc.13 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:35:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BUgO7Gn6HVGXmIvVSi76EssaR+MnNtPNxr+txyIXJQI=; b=ccopRKBGo9bGpf/7iufPjWYVdlsKtPQ7zcUNqcMpcos9T5NHbPlWq8so7iDOTjaNOc gIaSTFP7h/69QrayDSV8SFeydowsRoHjIo92O6VRdL1KCLojN23RefRvJ6LqtzWf+dCj RFM8EU5FcEMdVgLsa34eD82/KqEoVY3cV8njtGdLuP4cnbsvtLUGbWkj4Ecvk+KldZ/k PgS6H8NeJRI1iP4BzXvsCzRLLxTlzvTJWpemhVHZSIo2l7VB1ZBZ1xoFxa3eXQmcYgeD zXukIzPEmyNz2IwFjjcrxB1TdCdtrjFWPUlZzy38nUj/vwxj3DUotH1vHRbgF5AV3Lly lPig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BUgO7Gn6HVGXmIvVSi76EssaR+MnNtPNxr+txyIXJQI=; b=2X9lFPhOsOemcWYZuagRbXA+Y4VJS3yY54DJM08YSQVnuBBrbeWZRFvCitRlDkH9+V hbNbT8kS+7FcoryuNYOk1b3e655uG3lmTu/+OtfrSgqx+DlZEaEA8OBPtiaNhldZnz2k RXP1Y/emIXM2B8X1WMWbsZGKb+wcj3zrva6RyTphuT1gv1GcPEo08Mg6gFC4SG5kgT1O 6VhGrmmC2lUt6BoH/2OLZR7cDuz5WZ4r+Gs1kWiIvVk9x3l9bpvPrVu40pjZuOmUXwXM mSr2F+Kbzt8oDBzDf9Z3+usHJr6gmdrTRzcuwn3ubwdBrWmoURIx+1/bYEOrZK6gMqEU zW3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1YMJyjna7UsAxvZPbUWFkmdhul1sq2jsWQ/jt++GDJiQYwnJMS 8DhnoQoM80/3ODs8bnGbwG/GDE3ekuhiVPxzuifXkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4hW2xJKBoRlc2CjuPTMUiKPvR3WrNG+dw1Puc4847yKNeOsQ4MiYWzDDCtoRb1aZSdVlc5KSjaHClf3nk+AJk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0e6:0:b0:26e:4dd:16f5 with SMTP id h6-20020a2eb0e6000000b0026e04dd16f5mr157970ljl.268.1665041731050; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:35:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000000000000f2b07b05d5dc87cc@google.com> <00000000000093aefb05e9b93343@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:35:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in fscache_free_cookie To: Dongliang Mu Cc: syzbot , dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cachefs-bounces@redhat.com, linux-cachefs-owner@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nogikh@google.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 11:23, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 5:15 PM syzbot > wrote: > > > > This bug is marked as fixed by commit: > > fscache: fix GPF in fscache_free_cookie > > But I can't find it in any tested tree for more than 90 days. > > Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying: > > #syz fix: exact-commit-title > > Until then the bug is still considered open and > > new crashes with the same signature are ignored. > > @Dmitry Vyukov Why syzbot continuously complains about this bug > report? The fix commit looks correct. git log --grep "fscache: fix GPF in fscache_free_cookie" on the latest upstream tree gives me nothing. Where is this commit present? What's the git tree and commit hash?