From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763786AbdLSOlK (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:46154 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763763AbdLSOlF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:05 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovfWpXWR6LKYLm0lDbjqZut8HoDhchqJqzki4VBxZkbPtFBiSgckFZj6Q5EFFlR75JIFvaItQGpskRedmOJJLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201712192327.FIJ64026.tMQFOOVFFLHOSJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> References: <94eb2c03c9bc75aff2055f70734c@google.com> <001a113f711a528a3f0560b08e76@google.com> <201712192327.FIJ64026.tMQFOOVFFLHOSJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:40:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BUG: workqueue lockup (2) To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: syzbot , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , LKML , Linux-MM , Philippe Ombredanne , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > syzbot wrote: >> >> syzkaller has found reproducer for the following crash on >> f3b5ad89de16f5d42e8ad36fbdf85f705c1ae051 > > "BUG: workqueue lockup" is not a crash. Hi Tetsuo, What is the proper name for all of these collectively? >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/master >> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620 >> .config is attached >> Raw console output is attached. >> C reproducer is attached >> syzkaller reproducer is attached. See https://goo.gl/kgGztJ >> for information about syzkaller reproducers >> >> >> BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 37s! >> BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=-20 stuck for 32s! >> Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: >> workqueue events: flags=0x0 >> pwq 2: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 >> pending: cache_reap >> workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x80 >> pwq 2: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=2/256 >> pending: neigh_periodic_work, do_cache_clean >> workqueue mm_percpu_wq: flags=0x8 >> pwq 2: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 >> pending: vmstat_update >> workqueue kblockd: flags=0x18 >> pwq 3: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=1/256 >> pending: blk_timeout_work > > You gave up too early. There is no hint for understanding what was going on. > While we can observe "BUG: workqueue lockup" under memory pressure, there is > no hint like SysRq-t and SysRq-m. Thus, I can't tell something is wrong. Do you know how to send them programmatically? I tried to find a way several times, but failed. Articles that I've found talk about pressing some keys that don't translate directly to us-ascii. But you can also run the reproducer. No report can possible provide all possible useful information, sometimes debugging boils down to manually adding printfs. That's why syzbot aims at providing a reproducer as the ultimate source of details. Also since a developer needs to test a proposed fix, it's easier to start with the reproducer right away. > At least you need to confirm that lockup lasts for a few minutes. Otherwise, Is it possible to increase the timeout? How? We could bump it up to 2 minutes. > this might be just overstressing. (According to repro.c , 12 threads are > created and soon SEGV follows? According to above message, only 2 CPUs? > Triggering SEGV suggests memory was low due to saving coredump?)