linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stackdepot: Use a raw spinlock in stack depot
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 09:23:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+a5g5JeLJFPJEUxPFbMLXGkYEAJkK3MBctnn7UA-iTkXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210504024358.894950-1-ak@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 4:44 AM Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> In some cases kasan with lockdep complains about its own use of the stack
> depot lock. I think it happens when the kasan usage is nested inside a
> raw spinlock and it happens to create a new stack depot.
>
> Make the stackdepot lock raw too

+kasan-dev

Hi Andi,

So why is this a false positive that we just need to silence?
I see LOCKDEP is saying we are doing something wrong, and your
description just describes how we are doing something wrong :)
If this is a special false positive case, it would be good to have a
comment on DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK explaining why we are using it.

I wonder why we never saw this on syzbot. Is it an RT kernel or some
other special config?
A similar issue was discussed recently for RT kernel:
https://groups.google.com/g/kasan-dev/c/MyHh8ov-ciU/m/nahiuqFLAQAJ
And I think it may be fixable in the same way -- make stackdepot not
allocate in contexts where it's not OK to allocate.



> Example trace:
>
> [    1.156154] ACPI Error: No handler or method for GPE 01, disabling event (20210105/evgpe-839)
> [    1.156235] =============================
> [    1.156238] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> [    1.156242] 5.12.0-00071-gb34886074b65 #45 Not tainted
> [    1.156249] -----------------------------
> [    1.156252] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
> [    1.156258] ffffffff8535e158 (depot_lock){..-.}-{3:3}, at: stack_depot_save+0x162/0x450
> [    1.156288] other info that might help us debug this:
> [    1.156292] context-{5:5}
> [    1.156297] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
> [    1.156304]  #0: ffff888100838658 (*(&acpi_gbl_gpe_lock)){....}-{3:3}, at: acpi_ev_detect_gpe+0xa8/0x3e6
> [    1.156333]  #1: ffffffff85133dc0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __queue_work+0xd5/0x1010
> [    1.156363]  #2: ffff88815a04ec18 (&pool->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: __queue_work+0x258/0x1010
> [    1.156391] stack backtrace:
> [    1.156395] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-00071-gb34886074b65 #45
> [    1.156407] Call Trace:
> [    1.156413]  dump_stack+0xfa/0x151
> [    1.156427]  __lock_acquire.cold+0x366/0x41f
> [    1.156450]  ? orc_find+0x233/0x3c0
> [    1.156462]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x1d/0x50
> [    1.156476]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0
> [    1.156491]  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> [    1.156503]  ? deref_stack_reg+0x90/0x90
> [    1.156516]  lock_acquire+0x194/0x690
> [    1.156528]  ? stack_depot_save+0x162/0x450
> [    1.156541]  ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
> [    1.156553]  ? arch_stack_walk+0x88/0xf0
> [    1.156566]  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> [    1.156579]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x60
> [    1.156591]  ? stack_depot_save+0x162/0x450
> [    1.156603]  stack_depot_save+0x162/0x450
> [    1.156616]  kasan_save_stack+0x32/0x40
> [    1.156629]  ? kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40
> [    1.156642]  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xbc/0xe0
> [    1.156653]  ? insert_work+0x4b/0x2e0
> [    1.156665]  ? __queue_work+0x4cf/0x1010
> [    1.156677]  ? queue_work_on+0xb3/0xc0
> [    1.156689]  ? acpi_os_execute+0x1ca/0x340
> [    1.156701]  ? acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch+0x208/0x273
> [    1.156713]  ? acpi_ev_detect_gpe+0x35e/0x3e6
> [    1.156724]  ? acpi_ev_gpe_detect+0x269/0x334
> [    1.156736]  ? acpi_update_all_gpes+0x1cf/0x206
> [    1.156748]  ? acpi_scan_init+0x2a8/0x702
> [    1.156761]  ? acpi_init+0x230/0x2ba
> [    1.156773]  ? do_one_initcall+0xf0/0x540
> [    1.156784]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x38e/0x412
> [    1.156796]  ? kernel_init+0x12/0x1cf
> [    1.156807]  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> [    1.156818]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xf1/0x850
> [    1.156831]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0
> [    1.156844]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0
> [    1.156858]  ? acpi_scan_init+0x2a8/0x702
> [    1.156870]  ? do_one_initcall+0xf0/0x540
> [    1.156881]  ? kernel_init+0x12/0x1cf
> [    1.156892]  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> [    1.156903]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
> [    1.156915]  ? lock_acquire+0x194/0x690
> [    1.156927]  ? __queue_work+0x258/0x1010
> [    1.156940]  ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
> [    1.156952]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
> [    1.156964]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
> [    1.156977]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xe0
> [    1.156991]  kasan_record_aux_stack+0xbc/0xe0
> [    1.157003]  insert_work+0x4b/0x2e0
> [    1.157016]  __queue_work+0x4cf/0x1010
> [    1.157031]  queue_work_on+0xb3/0xc0
> [    1.157044]  acpi_os_execute+0x1ca/0x340
> [    1.157056]  acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch+0x208/0x273
> [    1.157069]  acpi_ev_detect_gpe+0x35e/0x3e6
> [    1.157082]  ? acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch+0x273/0x273
> [    1.157096]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
> [    1.157109]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40
> [    1.157122]  acpi_ev_gpe_detect+0x269/0x334
> [    1.157136]  ? acpi_bus_init+0x7ee/0x7ee
> [    1.157148]  acpi_update_all_gpes+0x1cf/0x206
> [    1.157161]  ? acpi_get_gpe_device+0x182/0x182
> [    1.157174]  ? acpi_get_table+0x11f/0x1f5
> [    1.157186]  ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0x80
> [    1.157199]  acpi_scan_init+0x2a8/0x702
> [    1.157212]  ? acpi_match_madt+0xc4/0xc4
> [    1.157225]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x1d/0x50
> [    1.157239]  ? __pci_mmcfg_init+0x91/0x21f
> [    1.157251]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x1d/0x50
> [    1.157265]  acpi_init+0x230/0x2ba
> [    1.157277]  ? acpi_bus_init+0x7ee/0x7ee
> [    1.157290]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0
> [    1.157304]  ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0x80
> [    1.157332]  do_one_initcall+0xf0/0x540
> [    1.157357]  ? perf_trace_initcall_level+0x3e0/0x3e0
> [    1.157370]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xe0
> [    1.157384]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0
> [    1.157398]  ? __kmalloc+0x1ae/0x380
> [    1.157410]  ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0x80
> [    1.157424]  kernel_init_freeable+0x38e/0x412
> [    1.157437]  ? rest_init+0x381/0x381
> [    1.157462]  kernel_init+0x12/0x1cf
> [    1.157474]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: peterz@infradead.org
> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/stackdepot.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
> index 49f67a0c6e5d..df9179f4f441 100644
> --- a/lib/stackdepot.c
> +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void *stack_slabs[STACK_ALLOC_MAX_SLABS];
>  static int depot_index;
>  static int next_slab_inited;
>  static size_t depot_offset;
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(depot_lock);
> +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(depot_lock);
>
>  static bool init_stack_slab(void **prealloc)
>  {
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>                         prealloc = page_address(page);
>         }
>
> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&depot_lock, flags);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&depot_lock, flags);
>
>         found = find_stack(*bucket, entries, nr_entries, hash);
>         if (!found) {
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>                 WARN_ON(!init_stack_slab(&prealloc));
>         }
>
> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&depot_lock, flags);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&depot_lock, flags);
>  exit:
>         if (prealloc) {
>                 /* Nobody used this memory, ok to free it. */
> --
> 2.25.4
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04  2:43 [PATCH] stackdepot: Use a raw spinlock in stack depot Andi Kleen
2021-05-04  7:23 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2021-05-04  9:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-04 15:34   ` Andi Kleen
2021-05-04 17:17     ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACT4Y+a5g5JeLJFPJEUxPFbMLXGkYEAJkK3MBctnn7UA-iTkXA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).