From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
syzbot
<bot+e7353c7141ff7cbb718e4c888a14fa92de41ebaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
shli@fb.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
ying.huang@intel.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in lru_add_drain_all
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:57:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bMaQx3yoXYS6pxKzpU-vfTqN0hdhuigfRjMQVV24awew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214154433.GD3443@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >> > > > [...]
>> >> > > > > If we want to save those stacks; we have to save a stacktrace on _every_
>> >> > > > > lock acquire, simply because we never know ahead of time if there will
>> >> > > > > be a new link. Doing this is _expensive_.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Furthermore, the space into which we store stacktraces is limited;
>> >> > > > > since memory allocators use locks we can't very well use dynamic memory
>> >> > > > > for lockdep -- that would give recursive and robustness issues.
>> >> >
>> >> > I agree with all you said.
>> >> >
>> >> > But, I have a better idea, that is, to save only the caller's ip of each
>> >> > acquisition as an additional information? Of course, it's not enough in
>> >> > some cases, but it's cheep and better than doing nothing.
>> >> >
>> >> > For example, when building A->B, let's save not only full stack of B,
>> >> > but also caller's ip of A together, then use them on warning like:
>> >>
>> >> Like said; I've never really had trouble finding where we take A. And
>> >
>> > Me, either, since I know the way. But I've seen many guys who got
>> > confused with it, which is why I suggested it.
>> >
>> > But, leave it if you don't think so.
>> >
>> >> for the most difficult cases, just the IP isn't too useful either.
>> >>
>> >> So that would solve a non problem while leaving the real problem.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What's the status of this? Was any patch submitted for this?
>
> This http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171116120535.23765-1-mhocko@kernel.org?
Thanks
Let's tell syzbot:
#syz fix: mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <089e0825eec8955c1f055c83d476@google.com>
2017-10-27 9:34 ` possible deadlock in lru_add_drain_all Michal Hocko
2017-10-27 9:44 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-27 9:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-27 13:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-30 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-30 10:09 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-30 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-30 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-31 13:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-31 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-31 13:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-31 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-31 14:58 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-31 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01 8:59 ` Byungchul Park
2017-11-01 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01 23:54 ` Byungchul Park
2018-02-14 14:01 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-02-14 15:44 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-14 15:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2017-10-31 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-31 15:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-31 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-01 8:31 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-30 10:26 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-30 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-27 11:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACT4Y+bMaQx3yoXYS6pxKzpU-vfTqN0hdhuigfRjMQVV24awew@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bot+e7353c7141ff7cbb718e4c888a14fa92de41ebaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).